So, the Will to power was an equation.  You acknowledge the authority that is the basis for all socio-political existence; the word of God. Then, you examine society to see if tangible expressions of the authority( the authority that includes the royal law) are being demonstrated and practiced by those who claim to stand upon it and live it.   The authority will never change since it would make society improbable and just impossible since people have dogs and cats in their families and these precious mammals are afforded protection under the law against inhumane treatment. This is echoed in the word of God. So, this equation says that if there is insufficient compliance with the authority in certain scenarios and with individuals that are used as focal points, those who seek the power will just do whatever they want and take the power but not necessarily alter the authority since there has to be a limit and everyone would still like to host the Olympic games or play a little football and not feel too bad about their disdain for the word of God although they promise to respect the authority and do things bigger or better for the benefit of everyone.   In any scenario, neither Happy, True and Joyful nor new and improved provide any change but the same old equation while they watch to see if the traditional bastions entrusted with safe-guardiing authority will do something about these unusual situations that are used as ladders to achieve the power in the will to power.  Have you read it? You've been living through it for quite some time now while there is a familiar feeling that you encountered once, maybe every day,  in some civic organization and you don't know why.  What if this formula ended up in the hands of domestic helpers  who had a big plan to earn recognition from people who they believe did not maintain a sufficient number of promises and they just resent anyone who buys anything except for food( like a Topic bar) from those people including, for example, a monthly subscription to the Guardian? It might mean killing every student  in the second generation who hoped for a better life and who did not join the peace corps( The pc's) to avoid this communal internecine, generational conflict occasioned by the first generation's fear of disloyalty or dissociation and who also forgot to kiss a shoe while reminding someone after graduation dinner that Mum and Dad came to seek a better life.