 |
| From the movie The Ambassador(2011). |
From the movie The Ambassador(2011). |
International Human Rights and the Law; We have some way to go in protecting all human life under the law. By Angel Ronan Lex Scripta and Warren A. Lyon; Researcher, Counsel.
Income support provided to transsexuals unconditionally regardless of municipal address in that jurisdiction is offending the judgement in Frazer v. Canada, SCC (2020) and Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) involving adverse impact discrimination. Some citizens receive 60% less than the transsexuals if they are regular males and females and if they live in certain locations. It has also activated genocide laws concerning the Iroquois and Assiniboine nation. A White female former school teacher just brought a motion on this issue at the Otario Human Rights Tribunal and an order is being drafted that makes all such income support available for all citizens at the age of 16 at no less than $136.00 per day paid bi weekly with no asset ownership limitations and with equal provision regardless of gender paid to each citizen just like it is paid by Quebec to Quebec citizens and paid by Manitoba to Manitoba citizens. You think you are here just for your looks! The current provision of $136.00 per day unconditionally only to transgender persons in Otario is indicative of gender inequality. This is part of the celebration in that it is now being resolved for the current PRIDE Festival since we all have pride and we have all watched Star Wars also. We would all like to have a car assembly job in some factory but due to the joblessness occasioned by automation, this job is not happening as often as we would want. Star Wars (1977) was an epitaph for modern industrial human labor being replaced by machines that can work 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This gives the human more time to raise families, maybe with ten or 12 children. But, how can we have families if mother and father do not have the money from a job? How can they have a job if most jobs have been automated, causing a joblessness where there are more people than jobs? How can they have the money if we do not give it to them in the form of a universal unconditional income support? Star Wars was also produced precisely 40 years after North Americans helped draft the UDHR in 1947. With what society saves collectively in the use of machines, they pay back to the human social participant at no less than $136.00 per day citizen. This is a simple solution that any properly motivated human being can understand. We all need the Maslow necessities of life and every machine is actually tested and registered with the FCC( Federal Communications Commission). As this is so, the Federal Government is a direct participant in the automation that has occasioned joblessness and also the financial depletion occasioned by this joblessness, effecting many former industrial workers. It is unfortunate if this falls upon you as a former car worker in the wrong state. But, you can always trek over to Illinois or Wisconsin or Minnesota or Vermont or Massachusetts where they do pay each citizen no less than $50,000.00 per year per citizen in most instances. How can people have money in the automated world if we do not give it to them...like the English, the French, the Germans, Asians and the Russians? We all need the Maslow necessities of life and every machine is actually tested and registered with the FCC( Federal Communications Commission). As this is so, the Federal Government is a direct participant in the automation that has occasioned joblessness and also the financial depletion occasioned by this joblessness, effecting many former industrial workers. This is helpful as it is not intended that human rights will butt heads with the power of technology. Instead, human rights is facilitated by technology and technology facilitates human rights. Human Rights Law is also the creature of the Federal Government and these Human Rights Laws carry a hybrid nature as they are born in and have stasis in the realms of both international and domestic law. The idea of a Federal Government having a fight with its population over the value of a robot vs. the value of its own population being maintained at the cost of $136.98 per day per citizen but paid bi weekly is totally asininely stupido but it is also America. It is also asinine when two key North Americans were involved in writing modern international laws; namely Eleanor Roosevelt and John Humphreys. Mrs. Roosevelt, who was considered a great American leader(apparently born in Otario), wrote 30 Human Rights principles that were eventually adopted by the United Nations with the UNCHR/UDHR being written partially by a Danadian named John Humphreys. This is ironic that North Americans were involved in the drafting of the documents and the preparation of the contents when the ongoing North American aboriginal resistance of these principles has led to a failure of full application of these principles in North America. However, aboriginal or nor, we are all domesticated animals and we need our food, shelter and the money necessary to attain them in our ongoing domesticated and automated experience. Who can resist this in a dog's life or a human's life? Aren't you a dog? Aren't we sort of like dogs or like flies in the Lord of the Flies(Movie)? See the Lord of the Flies(Movie) and a Dog's Life(movie). But, if a dog or dog man is going to kill us if given the chance, it reduces all and our humanity. Before we proceed any further, lets see how the joblessness occasioned by automation has led to Police Patrols of four people in an SUV with two of them being paramedics without weapons and two officers with weapons with one of the staffers piloting a drone for any work outside of the vehicle and for visual back up against any unseen interference on the way. No one has anything to worry about as some of the teams may involve husband wife couples as all officers are all on the same guaranteed promotion track to achieve the Rank of Chief of Personal Affairs. No one is fired unless it involves a wanton, serious disregard of the chain of command; with evidence where the life of colleagues or citizens were endangered or lost that would, most likely, also involve criminal charges. If an officer is ordered to use deadly force when necessary in any situation, it will appear on a database of communiques sent to the officer. A copy may remain on his personal work email. Otherwise, everyone stays in their position and if there is any communication difficulty, then they can be sent on retraining at an adult all day high school program at a university. There will be similar programs offered at colleges along with the usual programs for police foundations, cooking and clothing design but the police will attend adult all day high school programs offered at the universities. There is a lot of empty class room space available and big swimming pools for cpr and swimming lessons also.
?
The problem with humanity is that we are all domesticated animals. We make a mess like every other animal and the joy of domestication is that we have to agree and submit to standardized ways(UN, ISO, Constitution) and methods of life provided for us that amount to advanced ways of communal living in our domestication. This includes advanced capitalism with the income support that satisfies all Maslow needs and an income support at 30% or more to maintain the system without debt. We defecate in the toilet and not in the park or on the lawns. As such, we have no time for those who would like to argue or hold us back from our felicity in domestication. Automated money provided to citizens in what is called an income support is part of our domestication as animals. Some within our species would like to hold us back and resist this monied, non violent domestication where there is no killing or stealing from others as a way of life so that we can quietly enjoy or Maslow ways and needs as fulfilled by the income support.
A white North American Aboriginal from the North American outback named Joel Brightly is rising up to tell us how he can do it; how he will run democracy with a population depleted by his policies while Australia now has a larger population than the US. Where did all the Americans go? K Mart went with them along with all the Mall builders. He proposes that we go back to intermittent electric availability only 1/2 an hour every hour as it once was in the 1910's. He also proposes that we go back to whale oil for lanterns. Isn't that ridiculous? He says he is not sure about the income support or a sales tax at 30% that enables the country to avoid foreign debt dependency. There is terminology in domestic and international law involving terrorists and military combatants as well as civilians. There is also terminology involving naturalized and unnaturalized citizens. What would you call an aboriginal who is certainly in some form of a right of abode in his native lands but does he have the rights and protections of the human rights laws afforded by Domestic and International courts if he is not a registered legal entity or the naturalized citizen? Naturalized citizenship says he has documentation and ID numbers of various kinds and ultimately, he has passed beyond informal humanity into the formal. This article will be continued. As such, identification of the victim as well as identification of the accused are equally as important in any trial involving a murder or in any defense of the human rights accorded to all human beings but they can only be called upon by citizens or the formally, legally recognized human petitioners. Unregistered, non yet naturalized Aboriginality or Informal humanity is locked out of human rights protection. Countries and governments all over the world have this off the grid population as some citizens have chosen to leave official citizenship to live off the land but then the governments are in the process of naturalizing all human beings and providing the requisite income support that is a necessity in our automated world. In some territories, it might be a credit card sized mobile phone that will carry all the ID when powered up and is hard to lose for those living in harsh but habitable conditions. If you cannot power it up, the SIN numbers will appear on plastic bar codes etched into the plastic inside the phone under the battery that will refer to the new citizen once entered and most will be named Smith or Phillip Johns or Brown. They are testing it in Goat Island now, Kenya and also in India. Yet, to kill an unidentifiable human being who is unidentifiable only because he does not have official, formal registration still carries penalty for the destruction of or interference with human remains. See S.182 of the Canadian Criminal Code; Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who
· (a) neglects, without lawful excuse, to perform any duty that is imposed on him by law or that he undertakes with reference to the burial of a dead human body or human remains, or
· (b) improperly or indecently interferes with or offers any indignity to a dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not.
60 Concealing The Birth Of A Child- The UK Offences Against the Person Act, 1861. C
If any woman shall be delivered of a child, every person who shall, by any secret disposition of the dead body of the said child, whether such child died before, at, or after its birth, endeavour to conceal the birth thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years,
In further commentary,
The Courts did once tread where Parliament would not. In 1973, one Lennox-Wright (R vs Lennox-Wright, 1973, Crim. L. R. 529) appeared at the Old Bailey, charged with ‘Doing an act in disobedience of a statute by removing parts of a dead body, contrary to section 1 (4) of the Human Tissue Act 1961 (‘No such removal of an eye or part of an eye shall be effected except by…a registered medical practitioner…or a person in the employment of a health authority or NHS trust…’).' He had gained employment at the ophthalmic department of a hospital by means of forged qualifications and false representations as to experience, and had thereafter removed eyes from a dead body for use at another hospital. The trial Judge held that such conduct was a criminal misdemeanour, punishable by unlimited fine or imprisonment, albeit that the statute was silent as to the commission of any offence. For reasons unknown, this first instance decision was not appealed. I doubt that it would be followed today, not least because such an interpretation of a statute would be likely to fall foul of the Human Rights Act 1998. Indeed, a recommendation of the Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry (Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry 30 January 2001 Recommendations Ch. 10) is that the Human Tissues Act is amended by the addition of a specific criminal offence for infringement of its terms.-See a A corpse in law Andrew Campbell-Tiech First published: 10 June 2002https://doi.org/10.1046/j.
K. Sodesaki confirms in his article The legal status of a human corpse that A human corpse presents a number of difficulties, one of which involves difficulties associated with its legal status. A human body, once dead, is considered only as a weight of material, although it signifies continuity of what used to be a living being. A corpse is not an integral part of a human being any more. Legal human rights are only applicable to living humans, and not to a corpse. A fertilized human ovum, a human embryo, a fetus or a separated part of a (live) human body has legal-status problems that are similar to those of a corpse. In Japan, destruction, abandonment or ryotoku (take illegal possession) of a corpse, is forbidden by Japanese Criminal Law #190. This law aims to respect popular religious beliefs, rather than to protect personal rights of a given dead person.
Sodesaki confirms that, "Our society needs some other way to provide a dead person with legal protection."
So, this leads us to ask the question whether or not you can be arrested for assault on an unidentified or unidentifiable human being. It depends on the evidence There is no lacuna here. However, the 3rd party rights of a purchaser of some property without notice of it being owned by another is a lacuna. How could you not have notice of some other beneficial ownership if you searched title and if you did not, how can any claim of a 3rd party purchaser defeat the rights of any existing legal or equitable owner? That would be theft and possession of stolen property. It is not possible. Getting back to the assault of an unidentified victim, if witnesses and video evidence can say you assaulted a dog or a human aboriginal, it should be sufficient evidence to convict in any Court of Law. But, what about a White Female Aboriginal Woman prostitute who is all assimilated with her Revlon and her Garnier Micellar Waters? What about a Black Female Aboriginal Woman prostitute who is looking Mediterranean and more MTV with her Revlon? Hopefully, she also knows what to say at the bank about her assets when she is closing the account. She is supposed to receive the proceeds of the account in cash or in kind; possibly as a draft or money order. She is moving her account to Chime, Santander or Bank De America. Black, Brown, Red Yellow and White Aboriginal Value matters. The transgender feminine appearing prostitute has a guaranteed $50,000.00 of income support. The feminine kind who can give birth either have no support or they only have $20,000.00 a year. This is adverse impact discrimination, affecting men also. The human population is dependent on them for human reproduction and survival. Even if we remove the ultimate burden of reproduction from the human individual with some form of automation that provides replicant children to every human being that attends school in North America, we need the human population to be at least sustained financially in light of the joblessness caused by automation when employment or work or a job, so to speak, was once the only means of acquiring monies necessary to acquire the Maslow necessities of life as outlined in the Maslow hierarchy of human needs. Money now is considered a Maslow necessity as seen in the Maslow-Lyon hierarchy of needs. One of the problems we face though is with assimilation to this understanding of human life while we may have produced rabid humans set mindlessly on acceptance, social or political, but they have little human empathy for the general human population with disastrous affect. As such, we have a Juneteenth Law before we have national universal income support policies that would help all human beings in our socio economy. Now doubt, we have black and white aboriginals engaged in politics but it does not mean their mind and soul is ready, sufficiently evolved to do what is absolutely necessary to help aboriginal people when only an aboriginal, struggling to feel some independence would resent money being stuffed down their throats automatically when money is a symbol to the aboriginal of his cultural erasure and cultural submission; that he is supposed to shop instead of hunt or fish that certainly involves some violence against the other animals in our biosphere or certainly the animal's submission on a fish hook or the bank's submission to an AR15. This aboriginal who resists is soo locked in bitterness against cultural submission that he would rather say he would rather just rob the bank and beat up a teller or security guard or steal from other humans, while he, as an aboriginal, pretends to be an insurance agent. The Juneteenth law is a miracle and we applaud the sense of cultural acceptance now bestowed on all people of colour, the black and white aboriginals, but what is the point if I only have $10,000.00 in universal unconditional income support in Oklahoma which is not enough to buy a Mazda or Ford that I saw in the Juneteenth Ford sale? At $20000.00 per year, how can I afford the rent due on Juneteenth or the 19th of every month? This is genocide, an assault on our humanity when we marvel at the resistance and lack of submission to the simple policies that make our aboriginal human economy work or any human economy and the policy requires an income support that satisfies all our basic needs. $20,000.00 per year does not satisfy the requirements. If its Juneteenth, we are all black and that's okay but we need to feel good and if we do not agree to the policies for ourselves, we will never feel as good as the French who have agreed and nous avon le soutien du revenu tous les anne'e a' 50,000.00 euros. Je suis Francais mais je suis Aboriginal aussi dans Amerique. It is an assault. It is genocide against les Americains. It is said that Elizabeth 1st also resisted this le soutien du revenu/income support policy or something similar and ended up sacked by the Spanish, Europe essentially. If the evidence is available either by video or by written oral statements involving an assault, then it is sufficient evidence to convict. The identity of the victim is not necessary under the law. If it is, then a tree in the forest might have more protection than a human being when it certainly is illegal to chop down a tree in a forest if you don't own the property. Start chopping down trees on what is essentially Crown land and see what will happen. We are concerned with an offence against the state in Criminal Law. The State is the principle victim of the offence. This is what the law confirms as noted above. The point here is that the state has ongoing jurisdiction over the human body in life and in death, protecting its sanctity. This jurisdiction is clear. This does not mean the state owns the body in the usual sense of property ownership and further work must be done to ensure the appropriate, systematized treatment of the human body and remains. If the deceased has not committed his remains to scientific research, then his body cannot be used for such purposes. We have been taking blood tests for health purposes since birth in the modern world and our bodies as well as our lives are ensured and guaranteed a certain dignity with income support. The economies that have not honored these commitments have little excuse or reason and are now ultra vires economies; genocidal economies. If Automation was a small pox vaccine, I am sure we would have spent $136.00 per day per citizen to ensure against its jobless affects. Automation reduces a human being's ability to find work not unlike Small Pox. We are suffering a lag of fatigue in arguing with well dressed, dolled up male and female Neanderthals who seem to resist the obvious point here while they hope to stoke arguments with other cultures and economies who are now our economic masters while their children praise them,( The Chinese and the Japanese, The French and the Germans) for their fastidiousness and evident socioeconomic intelligence and humble, happy wisdom. I believe some Neanderthals in modern politics speak very well and tell people what they will say in what ever it is they want to say. Yet, they are more engaged in imitation of the figure or figures known as the politician, the powerful hegemonic man; imitating John Wayne or Eisenhower more than providing service and seeking as well as applying understanding; I reckon pilgrim.
Yes; I believe there is something here worthy of acknowledgement. It can be resolved positively with a few easy mutually beneficial solutions in hand such as the income support at no less than $136.00 per day per citizen paid bi-weekly and a sales tax that covers national expenditure. The jobless effects of Small Pox or automation on the population have reduced our reliance on other usual means of national revenue generation, making sales tax the more reliable means of national revenue generation. People are not working as often as they used to due to the joblessness triggered by automation; automation approved of by the government with machines approved by the government. But, can the government indirectly approve its population's financial suffocation when it does not, along with the approval of robots for automation, also correspondingly approve of the income support needed to help individuals and families survive the joblessness occasioned by automation where the joblessness causes a financial catastrophe in the lives of most, if not all former car workers or industrial employees. This affects car payments, mortgage payments, loan payments and card payments all due to the installation of robots as a replacement of human labor but more importantly, this affect on car and loan payments takes place when the income support is not implemented correspondingly for every citizen along with the robots being installed. While we may be all aboriginal, black or white, in North America due to various shades of appearance and various dna swimming through our veins, the aboriginal may celebrate MLK day or Juneteenth day but what is the point of the celebration if we do not celebrate our existence financially with a universal unconditional income support that is in league with what is provided to other citizens from other Asian and European economies when they will eventually outnumber us. Our cash registers do not discriminate. The Japanese, Chinese and the European and Russian man get constant approvals at the cash registers in Los Angeles or any where in the US or the world because he has no less than $70000.00 per year in Russian, Asian or European government income support so that there is no financial impedance in the Russian or Asian economic experience.
With respect to human remains, See the unusual OBGYN cases in America in the 1980's where several OBGYN's were accused of murder and went to trial but the victims were soo mutilated that only dna evidence could be used to identify them as patients whose files remained in the office drawers of Donna Barkwell who has also learned to put cement powder in ice cream and milk shakes to cause heart attacks and gum loss. The OBGYN's were apparently feminine transsexual people who were experimenting on the patients to understand themselves as they did not have wombs or ovaries as to give birth. Most suffered fatal car crashes unusually before the trial dates. The damage looked like the vehicle had been sledged hammered or hit with a large stone repeatedly. Their throats were also cut. Their bank accounts showed several payments from African and West Indian sources as the egg water for the urine from the victims were sold to labs in these jurisdictions. The monies were seized as proceeds of crime. See the movie Criminal Law with Kevin Bacon and Gary Oldman. See also the American Psycho. There are some science fiction movies that provoke a disregard for human life referred to as replicants or clones. Yet, the human being and the ongoing cultural and ethnic global diversity is the most significant variable in any future we imagine today and is worth a minimum of $200.00 per day per citizen in income support in any economy and jurisdiction any where in the world. Today, we are all numbers and genetic combinations of individuals from previous generations. But, we cannot idly tolerate subtle intrusions from the media or diminutions on the habeus corpus laws that part and parcel in the function of human rights and decency laws in real life and in the media. See the article by Jones, SI entitled A grave offence: corpse desecration and the criminal law. They state that;
The offence of ‘outraging public decency’ seems to fit better. However, the word public is key to the offence. In R v Hamilton15 it was established that, to make out the offence, two elements need to be proven. First that the act be of such a lewd character as to outrage public decency in the sense that it is liable to shock and disgust. Second is the requirement that the act take place in public, such that it was capable to being seen by two or more persons who were actually present (even if they did not in fact witness it). Had those who placed the bacon on Mrs Mohammed’s body then gone on to display the body in a public space, it is conceivable that they could have been held accountable for outraging public decency. This was the case in R v Gibson16, where the display of a sculpture of a human head adorning freeze-dried human foetus earrings was held to fall foul of the offence. The Law Commission have suggested that the requirement of two people actually being present should be removed
A recent production of the English "made for TV" drama entitled the Miniaturist offends these decency laws noted here; above.
For improper treatment of any human being or their body in death, there is criminal sanction sometimes amount to the sentence that is still life without parole. But, can you say its murder or identify a murder victim if they have no legally registered name for the Court to identify? Identity is certain these days involving 90% of the human populations. One drop of saliva will do. If its an American citizen, the blood tests and urine tests from birth provide dna in databases to identify any American. The dentists maintain databases also with the Federal Government. It is said that flu vaccines carry a small microscopic radio for identification. I received a flue vaccine last year and now all of a sudden, the billboards on the bus stop light up and say, "Hello Mr. Minority Report" when I walk by. It also happens when I walk by for my un-vaccinated friends who only have mobile phones with the location feature set to "on." Is it murder if someone is considered in compromise legally and they, somehow, drop into a machine room at an Airport and they cannot get out only to find out they are in a machine and they can only watch CNEN or maybe call a few people on the last list of calls noted on their mobile phone? By several definitions, it is murder even if the heart and brain are not dead as the person ceases to be a legal functioning entity. It is murder even if they could still own property. They cannot attend a Court or Tribunal on video or in person or maintain a legal action. So, it is murder. If you were in this state but not really dead but had sustained artificial consciousness and you could not do anything else but call a few people to say hello and ask how they were doing, who would you call just to see how they were doing maybe for a five minute call? With no doubt, this is an illegal scenario offending Habeus Corpus Laws but it might not offend these laws if there is an international warrant out for a said individual such as an Osama Bin Ladin who refused to implement any universal income support for his Iroquois, Ojibwe people. So, President Obama sent soldiers to rendition him. G. Bush Jr. started a war to smoke him out. Our standards concerning Habeus Corpus Laws and the avoidance of arbitrary summary, prolonged, indefinite detention cannot change from one American regime to the other, causing human rights uncertainty.
If you are harassing a business etc or a government as if that government must do as you say simply because you say your accent is English and your passport is English, then maybe that Government and your government might decide that your motivations warrant apprehension; maybe permanent inquisition(essentially death) and use in ongoing anthropology while your soul is maintained in a computerized indefinite detention. This would mean no more body, no more stolen soap at ASDA once a month with you being the aboriginal in between the world of the hunter gatherer and the world of registered property ownership but it would mean just your brain and your capability to communicate with the inquisitors; forever since they want to understand your bad motivators. It could also violate international anti-slavery laws in the UK and Europe. But, if it is government harassment and interference where there is evidence, death is a significant penalty and a trial for terrorism then must first ensue with your intention being to interrupt government or trespass in government property. If there is evidence, then such a sentence as described above could be levied but the participant must have knowledge of their risk of apprehension and they must also be given an opportunity to surrender by a certain date where, if they do not, then the computerized internment following a trial is real with or without defense counsel; a trial taking place while they are still alive and not interned would be suitable. It would only take a few hours. An offer to participate in some other form of involvement in a study by answering questions on a laptop with a sensor strapped to your foot and with an order to keep the peace and be of good behavior would be suitable with 3000 days of community service in some way or means; with a cash stipend. The intention would be to reform the soul. Movie plots are not harassment and nor is it harassment to remind governments of the laws on their books. It might be harassment if you use a 1 hour tv spot on a news channel to appeal with bias for 3 years/1095 days for the impeachment of any President. There is always a call for impeachment on every President. This is just the nature of American politics. If he survives it, then he is a real champ; a star with an extra stipend in the billions; from Europe. Otherwise, he has no real fastidious place in history books or the popular news magazines. It puts him in history and in the headlines.
This necessity for identification in being able to establish the human rights claim and the assertion of a right does not say international authorities are not responsibly engaged engaged in the defense of the meaningfulness of human life; all human life. All animals are protected. All human beings are protected. Yet, there is intrusion by Pirate cultures who believe anything can be bought or sold and that all laws and civility can be interrupted. They believe our constitutions are just ideas. We cannot underestimate the power of a Mass continent wide North American Grendel aboriginal resentment or the ability of one Grendel to take on and wield our language to sell non existent goods, non existent insurance policies and make $300,000.00 per year at a $1000.00 per victim with 300 victims on illegal non existent policies, selling a black man to the world as a president and to also entertain and satisfy his own vein aboriginal cause, leading to mass destruction and human deprivation in resisting the simple solution with income support at 30% sales tax to solve any automation economy. This man will do this since the cave is his castle and all the land in the world is his kingdom. The black man was an nice black man though who seems to have understood the simple answer and he presents well whether or not he went to Law School, read a law book or Thomas Paine or Thomas Hobbes and he has certainly enunciated and promoted the establishment of a recession proof economy as based on a national universal income support.
The Pirate Grendel resents and threatens the administrators of our societies and economies who believe that our Constitutions are certainly more than just vain ideas and are actually iron cages to protect and defend civility from inhumanity and from economic concupiscence involving property, position and social power that is also referred to as covetousness; turning all human life into a cheap disposable in these pirate cultures worth the value of a new car muffler or aftermarket car satellite navigation system. As such, international human rights organizations and police services are watchful for men who participate and who also seem to be men and women who refuse to respect property ownership, men who make themselves depraved in spite of all the resources available to them so that they become the hungry. At the same time, there is a presumption of some kind of immunity against responsibility for one's actions, political or otherwise, and I don't see anyone in front of me but a grade 7 educated former postal worker in an expensive suit with his political platitudes turned on for machine gun style verbal "Teddy Ruxpin" automated espousal but with no genuine desire or possibly no power to solve his continent's economy that should be as easy as starting the fire; the fire of capitalist fulfillment. He hates any European with an Accent or English or Irish with an accent that could have authority over him in North America. In his defense, democracy or an abuse of democracy has put him in place allegedly to help the continent if he could, but you would not ask him how to level and grade the roads for population safety so why let him decide how to manage the economy? He has made it clear that he is not incapable but he is not in a position to arrive at any reasonable suggestion; Grendel's son or not. He is a spokesperson and he is doing alright. His speech is usually flawless but we are supposed to help with something intelligent to say regarding the economy. Roads are essential to the economy and so is the income support and the sales tax percentage. You will tell them and show them. Well, good. That would then mean we have the income support at the requisite satisfactory number(a minimum of $50,000.00 per year per North American citizen across North America to please the global car sales executives and to satisfy domestic defense and domestic security. Is he not looking more American than an American comparatively as the master pretender Charles the pretender mixed with a dead Irish bank robber who was killed with no trial and a dead Ojibwe who jumped in front of a train after ten white men severed his male organs. Thank God for this revival and resuscitation of common sense and love for the American aboriginal to aid aboriginal humanity. God bless Joseph of Egypt. He did it all by himself; saving America as the leader of all of America. I love America. FDR once said that, "The men who are hungry are the stuff of which dictatorships are made." Dictatorship is a function of desire; not necessarily hunger but the self-induced forced hunger is a means of a dog's manipulation of the master's conscience that somehow, the master has not fed the dog and the master is now in violation of his own law, rule and order but when did the dog learn how to manipulate to create an in -road to power in the concupiscence in seeking ultra vires power with no commitment to principles except the principles and will of the one mind or ego with no official commitment to human rights laws although some dictators do manage such commitment? Some, do not. We have allegedly democratically elected leaders in some countries who seem to think the notion of democracy is subsumable, synonymous with full human rights commitment and it is not. Communism carries official oversight, defense and commitment to human rights laws for the defense and protection of its own people as this is also where all national defense begins; by definition. This is seen in France and Germany(Democratic Countries) as well as Russia, China and Cambodia being non-democratic examples. If you do not ensure the viability and health of your own people, then how can you have an army? Military arguments with America is like a chess game with a frog. This is the irony of Communism in that it is misunderstood by the west when it is nothing more than Rabbi Government and we have no time for a devil or a Self seeking Judas in office with Judas people who sell out his economy over and over and over again. With this being so, their more advanced economies have been more humane and also more recession proof in that logic is not the fodder of vain self seeking and self coronation to achieve for a covert community the re-coronation of King Saul in his concupiscence for Absolute authority and unconditional acceptance. We expect democracy and legal culpability with the Specter of impeachment. He says 4% sales tax and expects unconditional acceptance in his vain imagination. I want democracy but we have evolving standards of technology and socio-economic programming that must satisfy immediate implementation or else we will be behind our alleged enemies who are not enemies really but allies in humanity. The implementation of new standard technology and policy goes forward without hesitation in the American phone industry and road building but in social and economic policy, there is a delay and a frustration of fulfillment and implementation but all are designed for human safety and protection but they are not all applied with the same immediacy and the understanding of code red necessity. This pretender that you endure in America is only telling the population what he wants and thinks about himself in this role or job that carries criminal liability. Well, he says it carries criminal liability for all other Presidents but him. 4% sales tax is treason and a high crime as it inevitably reduces the national resources when pitted against national expense; especially the cost of the Presidency and border patrol/ Customs. Those two expenses require at least a Federal Sales Tax of 19% to break even. What say you?
