Search This Blog

Monday 18 May 2015

Banning books may help to keep morally weak students focused on what is most important.

Banning books may help to keep morally weak students focused on what is most important. Certain books are best suited as banned books since they do not foster an egalitarian  and civil society but a limited and ignorant one; books such as M. Kampf.  One's right to maintain an oxytocin addiction by watching tv is entitled to it. It is their right.  But, this right can be maintained privately. Regardless of content, Tv or the television set including the cell phone is an oxytocin spa. Tv as a medium finds its seminal origins in the first moving pictures as first presented to the world and the public in 1911. The power of moving pictures is to convey information with emotion grabbing reality that fuels the production of oxytocin.  Certain content, however,  should remain private and not a matter of public media digestion.  Tv stations and magazines are public mediums and so is the content. This is also true of newspapers.  This has nothing to do with secularism. You can be as secular as you wish in private. There are just certain things you can't say in public because it is unlawful and maybe just abusive.  You cannot incite crimes against the state or violent crimes against citizens of the state. Also, you should not incite the festering of ignorance no matter how you sketch it in  liberal Judeo-Christian society. It could be the incitement of hate crimes against certain citizens who have long beards and hunt duck or mongoose while living in Afghanistan.  It may embarrass your Judeo-Christian up bringing and your moral rectitude that makes you feel superior enough to look down sketchily  on other people.  It's embarrassing to Pastors and Judaic teachers; especially those who are part of inter-faith circles. Let's not mention the embarrassment to those countries and states that export more bibles and build more water wells than anyone else in the world.  If you claim to be better than some other religious group that claims Abraham as a prophet, then shouldn't you set the better "Godly" example and enforce societal Judeo-Christian magnanimity, thereby quelling racial ignorance? "Girls Gone Bible" commercials might be appropriate for day time tv but some people might find it offensive. God has no skin-tone but he does   know ignorance as evil and respectful tolerance as the good.  Speech is not entirely free.  There is also certain free speech that should not be called free since it only reduces the validity of one's own society and neuters the traditions that inspire  the transmission of values to  newer generations to bring about  greater magnanimity and not less.  Also, it may not help to declare war in movies just as someone is loading a drone to drop bombs or fire missiles in a certain part of the world somewhere east of the middle. It's not that you should not make a declaration in a Hollywood production  because that is what everyone is used to or expects  in a Judeo-Christian society influenced by M. Kampf but everybody knows what you plan to do, however. Maybe someone should think about it.  Unfortunately, M. Kampf can be summarized as "misery loves company" and wishes to share his misery and normalization of the devaluation of human life on the big screen. It does not approximate the royal law.    If page 3 involved photos of the countryside with green meadows filled with  dandy-lions, it would be quite digestible as content in public media.

If media was not public in nature, then no one could sue for libel and slander. Isn't that right?

 


No comments:

Post a Comment