What if Hitler campaigned with an American accent in a blue suit, with blondish hair and lots of support that it was going to be great or huge? How does this translate into "fricken" English? One benefit of totalitarianism is that it could be the only way in which to save mankind from depleted morality, the "borg" and the emotional sex zombies who hate the truly living. But, such totalitarianism will have to be of some concern if all citizens, asylum seekers and genuine refugees are not guaranteed humane treatment. He might have been measured for a certain type of uniform in advance of the election but I don't really know though actually.
Germany repented and is an example of repentance from such inhumanity. It should not rear its ugly head in the 21st century. Did you know that in the 19th century, Germany gave the world two modernizing forms of Judaism? There has to be a reason.
New!Clean Pure Christlike energy to move 1063 pounds of bricks in one sheer movement using the power of a man's back or horses requires energy.That is all!Abraham had no four wheel engined vehicle but he had faith and common sense to do whatever God demanded of him in a way that was efficient and respectful to all of God's creation of which he was a part.Abraham also had no written law; also true for Joseph or Jacob or Moses when Moses crossed the red sea.All posts are authored by Warren A.Lyon.
Search This Blog
Monday, 14 September 2015
"Yasha(Hebrew)" Was Eve's New Name After The Crash, Repentance And deliverance.
"I experienced Crash (the 2005 movie) in real life. It was based on our experience as a black so- called "uppity" couple that wrote their own university essays and graduate theses; not like those murderers who used or still use them some how. But, why are we uppity if we don't know anything other than the school rules? We are the same couple that also believes in God and the same officer who molested me, saved my life. I wanted to sue and divorce my husband for not saving me from the officer's molestation but they have guns and really could have killed us both.;I will never be racist or think in stereotypes about the poolice again. I love my husband. God bless America. Thank God. The movie sort of picked a scab in the minds of women in my community though. We do not want to be dehumanized any more than was necessary to pay our tuition when they tell you that you do not qualify for funding although I used a false address and claimed falsely to be a single mother. But, white people do it at least I want to think it to justify my claimed badge of honor as a victim of injustice in a white society. Some white people think I am a raisin in the sun and deserve the victim's honor. I had to get a scholarship for basketball but at least I did not use someone's essays. I at least showed thankfulness for my scholarship. I also decided to drive a bus for a living all day but in second gear though since sometimes people think you are showing off or being proud if you follow the manual or respect the V.P who told you how to improve your evaluation based on the meridian system metrics. There was the thought of reasoning about the waste of electricity or server memory to do it "that" way but you also graduated by doing as you were told and it was what she wanted. It was what was understood eventually as aiding the productivity analysis. There was no need to ask why it had to be done that way although it meant spending more time sitting at your desk and on the phone than solving the passenger complaints. So, running back to the desk and only leaving for the most purposeful conversation with one of several managers of operations and finding a balance got the job done accordingly. The average cigarette or caramilk bar break is 10 minutes so it was best to actually take 7 minutes to ask any body a question or use the sal de bain; Yasha. My husband trained people accordingly at his job also. I think he is a little mixed but he could be fully something; even African. Some full Africans look like him eh. No matter what, he is human. Any culture that dehumanizes human beings is Anti-Christ. Ah Ah; don't you know? "
Sunday, 13 September 2015
The Various Prophecies...
The various prophecies concerning the end are not prescriptions for the end. They are actually reminders to return to our civilizational foundations referred to as the beginning. It does not mean there will not be adultery in people's lives or murder. At least, TV should help us to understand these human anomalies as undesirable and inhumane. The anomalies hurt their children, cut their hands off and commit adultery and murders. What is the point of cutting off someone's hand or abusing that two year old daughter and then telling them after the missing hand for the first time that you are their father? What did the child do to you except go to Yoda for some schooling? Your real last name is Skywalker. His last name was always Skywalker. Why didn't you just pick him up as a boy on Tatooine? You could have made it your mission instead of building a Star or Death. Then, you would have been the teacher. You could have killed his hair, teeth and lungs and given him a helmet with a breathing apparatus. You would have had all the dark side you want. But, this is not the purpose of the Star Wars movie series and nor would anyone watch it if it was. Children do not identify and claim parents. Parents should claim children. The mother should know who is the father. Fathers should not be abused for a mother's decision to have someone's child but never communicate her decision to the father or advise him of his miraculous role. Mary at least told Joseph. This is sin and any child can see Mommy or Daddy is hurt by adultery or the murder of any nice relative. But, it is the belief that humanity will not dissolve itself in celebrating adultery and murder. There are prophecies concerning the gentiles that should be of equal anticipation as the prophecies concerning the Anti-Christ and the second coming. Hebrews 9 concerns the second coming. The blood of Christ is sufficient for all eternity to satisfy the remission of sins. The television is a symbol of our civilization that causes us to marvel. But, the marvel should not be the very unraveling of our civilization. M.K and J.F.K were considered second comings to some and if they were, some one should have considered Hebrews 9 before bringing so much to bide on the issues that remain un-addressed in our Judeo Christian society and the marvelous television technology that we have created. It looks marvelous; wonderful! However, it should not be dedicated to the magnifying of evil. It should magnify the moral concerning the preservation of life and of humanity. This may involve disciplining or removing from community those individuals who are bent diabolically, beyond a change of soul or mind, on the inhumane treatment of others; those who are antichrist. This was the purpose of the Judaic law and the prophets. This was the purpose of the gospel. Batman and the X-Men is a good example. Star Wars is not too far behind in communicating that moral.
Saturday, 12 September 2015
Hug your wife with two hands. It takes two or two elements. Read Ecclesiastes 4.
Edited and abbreviated so that it is a fun discussion of life and why men have two hands; not one. Two hands are to hold and hug a wife. One hand is to scratch your head and ask why she left you for not hugging more often. You use one hand too often. In addition to this, men should not have to semi-eunuch themselves so that their wives can trust them. It is also for some guarantee that the civil society will work in your life like the reliability of a civil subway system but you do pay for both in your taxes. A s such, the wife's need for the semi-eunuch husband stems from the new phenomena involves wives who watch anything they want, especially of a "yyy" nature, becoming paranoid about adultery when in the relational nexus of a marital relationship. But, watching anything with a "yyy" nature is, in fact, psychological adultery. With the bible inside every childhood, you will probably be like the paranoid old man in the 60's who had the Sunday Lawrence Welk and Church Choir member wife but who watched horrible things in the garage by himself on the 8 mm cameras and people observed him through the little crevices between the door and the door frame to understand why he felt so distant afterwards and became some what paranoid about who the wife was with or where she was as if he was projecting his guilt or fear about something on to her including the fear of being left. It is just not befitting to the long term dynamic of the marital relationship. But, humans build airplanes and they also analyze the disaster the dynamics of an airline disaster that kills mothers, fathers, married couples from Cancun and whole entire church communities so they can analyze the dynamics of what is destroying the family and human reproduction that is occasioned by the normalizing of destructive media consumption.
The wielding or the bible wielding is quite the thing these days when people are worshiping. Neither wielding nor bible wielding is an offence. But, you ask how either could be an offence. We determine this by looking at intention since wielding alone could not be a criminal matter. The act of wielding or bible wielding would be called the act or first element of the offence. If there is wrongful intention( the thought element or mens rea), it would be a criminal act. You need two elements to ensure that the circumstance can be analyzed appropriately. Can you say the act of wielding carried the requisite criminal intention? In sport, a kick to the leg is not criminal and nor is recovery of stolen property found in someone's bed room such as a box full of cash with personal items if it does not belong to the owner of the house. You took the box to prevent the furtherance of what you believed was an offence. You could have been mistaken but in either case, you would be liable for possession of stolen property for picking up the box. However, you could argue that you had the right intention to prevent an offence. Returning it to the owner listed on the box address is the right answer and you should do it right away before the box is found in your unlawful possession. The kick to the leg in sport is the potential criminal act or actus reus. The witness may say it was deliberate and intentional. In sport, recklessness remains the requisite mens rea. However, as a sport participant, you consent to a certain degree of reasonably vigorous contact with others that is appropriate for that particular sport. If someone pushes you down and punches you in the face in a tennis match, that discloses sufficient mens rea or willful mind. The actus reus or criminal act in the punching during a tennis match is evident. If the contact rises above the reasonable expectation of the sport and recklessly so, it is also sufficient mens rea or willful mind. There is also sufficient actus reus(the criminal act); needless to say. It is not reasonably expected that anyone should be punched during a tennis match by the opposing player or a fan. As such, bible wielding alone could be discussed as a singular element offence. But even if so, it would have to be understood that it was bible wielding for something other than worshiping and that it was criminal in nature. We would have to be able to answer why the bible wielding is criminal in nature. You cannot answer the "why" without an analysis of what motivated the bible wielding . This is why you need two elements so that you can understand what happened, how and why anyone wants to think someone's bible wielding for bad food at a restaurant is a criminal matter. The bible wielding would be criminal if it could be said it was either reckless or intentional but in either case, it caused the owner to apprehend unlawful force being used against him to constitute a simple assault. It would not be criminal if your bible wielding was caused by a prayer attack brought on by the bad food. Shouting and deliberate cursing for bad food carries the actus reus and the mens rea( that is either willful or reckless) concerning disturbing the peace or uttering threats. It may also be sufficient for a simple assault since an assault is defined in some societies as the unlawful touching of another or as causing someone to fear or apprehend unlawful force being used against them." Unlawfully kick tennis player" or "kick tennis player" leaves little for discussion. "Unlawfully possess, read or wield bible" or "possess, read or wield bible" requires further discussion. How is it an offence to read or possess a book? Possessing or reading a bible is not an offence and people should not be treated as if it is but it could be an unlawful offence to read the bible loudly as one crying in an urban wilderness on a subway platform. This is essentially disturbing the peace but it would not be an issue to preach respectfully and hand out bible tracts or just hand out bibles. John Wesley used to do this quite a lot. He was not liable for any criminal offence. There are strict liability offences that do not require mens rea such as public nudity. But, most offences will require two elements. It could never help if the mental element or mens rea was removed from the analysis and discussions of most scenarios or situations as contemplated under the law.
So, bring the ex wife's sister back and kill on her for being a pianist and let go of all the people who don't know how you raped her in the 80's, stole her mail, her education, burned her gums with drano in her denture glass and how you abused her. You should know that you are loved old man.
The wielding or the bible wielding is quite the thing these days when people are worshiping. Neither wielding nor bible wielding is an offence. But, you ask how either could be an offence. We determine this by looking at intention since wielding alone could not be a criminal matter. The act of wielding or bible wielding would be called the act or first element of the offence. If there is wrongful intention( the thought element or mens rea), it would be a criminal act. You need two elements to ensure that the circumstance can be analyzed appropriately. Can you say the act of wielding carried the requisite criminal intention? In sport, a kick to the leg is not criminal and nor is recovery of stolen property found in someone's bed room such as a box full of cash with personal items if it does not belong to the owner of the house. You took the box to prevent the furtherance of what you believed was an offence. You could have been mistaken but in either case, you would be liable for possession of stolen property for picking up the box. However, you could argue that you had the right intention to prevent an offence. Returning it to the owner listed on the box address is the right answer and you should do it right away before the box is found in your unlawful possession. The kick to the leg in sport is the potential criminal act or actus reus. The witness may say it was deliberate and intentional. In sport, recklessness remains the requisite mens rea. However, as a sport participant, you consent to a certain degree of reasonably vigorous contact with others that is appropriate for that particular sport. If someone pushes you down and punches you in the face in a tennis match, that discloses sufficient mens rea or willful mind. The actus reus or criminal act in the punching during a tennis match is evident. If the contact rises above the reasonable expectation of the sport and recklessly so, it is also sufficient mens rea or willful mind. There is also sufficient actus reus(the criminal act); needless to say. It is not reasonably expected that anyone should be punched during a tennis match by the opposing player or a fan. As such, bible wielding alone could be discussed as a singular element offence. But even if so, it would have to be understood that it was bible wielding for something other than worshiping and that it was criminal in nature. We would have to be able to answer why the bible wielding is criminal in nature. You cannot answer the "why" without an analysis of what motivated the bible wielding . This is why you need two elements so that you can understand what happened, how and why anyone wants to think someone's bible wielding for bad food at a restaurant is a criminal matter. The bible wielding would be criminal if it could be said it was either reckless or intentional but in either case, it caused the owner to apprehend unlawful force being used against him to constitute a simple assault. It would not be criminal if your bible wielding was caused by a prayer attack brought on by the bad food. Shouting and deliberate cursing for bad food carries the actus reus and the mens rea( that is either willful or reckless) concerning disturbing the peace or uttering threats. It may also be sufficient for a simple assault since an assault is defined in some societies as the unlawful touching of another or as causing someone to fear or apprehend unlawful force being used against them." Unlawfully kick tennis player" or "kick tennis player" leaves little for discussion. "Unlawfully possess, read or wield bible" or "possess, read or wield bible" requires further discussion. How is it an offence to read or possess a book? Possessing or reading a bible is not an offence and people should not be treated as if it is but it could be an unlawful offence to read the bible loudly as one crying in an urban wilderness on a subway platform. This is essentially disturbing the peace but it would not be an issue to preach respectfully and hand out bible tracts or just hand out bibles. John Wesley used to do this quite a lot. He was not liable for any criminal offence. There are strict liability offences that do not require mens rea such as public nudity. But, most offences will require two elements. It could never help if the mental element or mens rea was removed from the analysis and discussions of most scenarios or situations as contemplated under the law.
So, bring the ex wife's sister back and kill on her for being a pianist and let go of all the people who don't know how you raped her in the 80's, stole her mail, her education, burned her gums with drano in her denture glass and how you abused her. You should know that you are loved old man.
Do you know there are some people who believe it is their job to define your sexuality? If they steal a book from your house, they say you are gay if you don't know it's them and actually retaliate. They should leave a note. They also call you gay if they damage your vehicle, you do not know who it is and as a result, you do not retaliate. But, how can you know unless they leave a note? It is quite ignoble to do such a thing.
But, you can't be gay when you know how to use your two hands to love your wife. What does gay mean any way? Two hands are to hold and hug a wife. One hand is to scratch your head and ask why she left you for not hugging more often. You use one hand too often. In addition to this, men should not have to semi-eunuch themselves so that their wives can trust them. It is also for some guarantee that the civil society will work in your life like the reliability of a civil subway system but you do pay for both in your taxes. As such, the wife's need for the semi-eunuch husband stems from the new phenomena involves wives who watch anything they want, especially of a "yyy" nature, becoming paranoid about adultery when in the relational nexus of a marital relationship. But, watching anything with a "yyy" nature is, in fact, psychological adultery. With the bible inside every childhood, you will probably be like the paranoid old man in the 60's who had the Sunday Lawrence Welk and Church Choir member wife but who watched horrible things in the garage by himself on the 8 mm cameras and people observed him through the little crevices between the door and the door frame to understand why he felt so distant afterwards and became some what paranoid about who the wife was with or where she was as if he was projecting his guilt or fear about something on to her including the fear of being left. It is just not befitting to the long term dynamic of the marital relationship. But, humans build airplanes and they also analyze the disaster the dynamics of an airline disaster that kills mothers, fathers, married couples from Cancun and whole entire church communities so they can analyze the dynamics of what is destroying the family and human reproduction that is occasioned by the normalizing of destructive media consumption.
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
But, you can't be gay when you know how to use your two hands to love your wife. What does gay mean any way? Two hands are to hold and hug a wife. One hand is to scratch your head and ask why she left you for not hugging more often. You use one hand too often. In addition to this, men should not have to semi-eunuch themselves so that their wives can trust them. It is also for some guarantee that the civil society will work in your life like the reliability of a civil subway system but you do pay for both in your taxes. As such, the wife's need for the semi-eunuch husband stems from the new phenomena involves wives who watch anything they want, especially of a "yyy" nature, becoming paranoid about adultery when in the relational nexus of a marital relationship. But, watching anything with a "yyy" nature is, in fact, psychological adultery. With the bible inside every childhood, you will probably be like the paranoid old man in the 60's who had the Sunday Lawrence Welk and Church Choir member wife but who watched horrible things in the garage by himself on the 8 mm cameras and people observed him through the little crevices between the door and the door frame to understand why he felt so distant afterwards and became some what paranoid about who the wife was with or where she was as if he was projecting his guilt or fear about something on to her including the fear of being left. It is just not befitting to the long term dynamic of the marital relationship. But, humans build airplanes and they also analyze the disaster the dynamics of an airline disaster that kills mothers, fathers, married couples from Cancun and whole entire church communities so they can analyze the dynamics of what is destroying the family and human reproduction that is occasioned by the normalizing of destructive media consumption.
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
Friday, 11 September 2015
Jesus in Tyre.
http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/article/5052
Jesus walked in Tyre and broke the fallow ground. He witnessed in Tyre such that people were saved. They repented and achieved what was right to cancel anger and death.
Jesus in the Region of Tyre and Sidon
Submitted by Gordon Franz on Wed, 10/31/2007 - 05:00 Gordon Franz
JESUS IN THE REGION OF TYRE AND SIDON
Gordon Franz
Introduction
During the summer of 2005, while standing on top of the dump of Area A-5, I had a conversation with the director of the Hazor excavation, Dr. Amnon Ben Tor. He asked me why most Christian pilgrims and tourists visit Megiddo, but not Hazor. I responded that there were two reasons. The first reason is logistics. The pilgrim / tourist lands at Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv and spend the first night in either Tel Aviv or Natanya. The next day they head for Nazareth and the Sea of Galilee. Megiddo is just off the road on the way to Nazareth, so they stop there. The second reason is its Biblical connection. Megiddo is mentioned in Revelation 16:16 as Armageddon. With that, Amnon said, “Find me a New Testament connection for Hazor!” I replied that I thought the Lord Jesus walked past the site on several occasions with His disciples. He said emphatically, “Write me an article!”
As I contemplated and researched this assignment, I came to the conclusion that Jesus walked past the ruins of Hazor with His disciples on their way to the region of Tyre and Sidon. But I wondered, “Why did Jesus take His disciples to the region of Tyre and Sidon?” There might have been a handful of Jewish people living in this predominately Gentile area that was outside the territory of Galilee. In fact, Josephus, the First Century Jewish historian comments that “among the Phoenicians the Tyrians, are notoriously our bitterest enemies” ( Against Apion 1:70, 71; LCL 1:191). That does not sound like a nice neighborhood to visit!
The accounts of this visit to Gentile territory can be found in Matt. 15:21-28 and Mark 7:24-30.
Theme
The Syro-Phoenician woman is used by the Lord Jesus as a test case to expose prejudice in the lives of the Twelve and then teach them a very valuable lesson concerning prejudice. The lesson is this: an exclusive mentality caused by pride; one that says we’re better than you, economically, ethnically, physically, religiously, can result in prejudice and could lead to partiality and discrimination.
Just prior to Jesus’s departure from the Sea of Galilee, He addressed the issue of defilement. His disciples asked Him about His comments. He answered them, “What comes out of a man, that defiles a man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness. All these things come from within and defile a man” (Mark 7:20-23). Jesus then gave a vivid lesson to His disciples about pride that came to fruition as prejudice.
Matthew and Mark are the only gospel writers that record this event. Mark, hearing this account from Peter, would have recorded it because this was a lesson Peter had to learn the hard way. Even though he was an apostle to the circumcision, Peter came to realize that salvation was for all, both Jews and Gentiles. Mark was also writing to a Jewish audience in Rome. Both record this event because they may have included this event in order to provoke their Jewish audience to jealousy when they realize Gentiles can be part of the Kingdom of God as well (Rom. 11:11, 12).
The Geographical and Historical Setting
Matthew and Mark both record that Jesus and the Twelve departed to the “region of Tyre and Sidon” (Matt. 15:21; Mark 7:24, 31). Commentators are divided as to whether Jesus and His disciples actually visited these Phoenician cities or they just stepped out of Galilee into the region of Tyre. If it’s the latter, they could have gone up the Hulah Valley, just past the ancient city of Hazor and headed up the hill toward Kedesh of Naphtali. Josephus says that Kedesh, or Kedasa, as it was known in the First century, was “a Tyrian village” ( Wars 2:459; LCL 2: 503). The fact that Sidon is mentioned by the gospel writers seems to indicate that they went deeper into Tyrian territory than just stepping outside of Galilee.
http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/article/5052
Jesus walked in Tyre and broke the fallow ground. He witnessed in Tyre such that people were saved. They repented and achieved what was right to cancel anger and death.
Jesus in the Region of Tyre and Sidon
Submitted by Gordon Franz on Wed, 10/31/2007 - 05:00 Gordon Franz
JESUS IN THE REGION OF TYRE AND SIDON
Gordon Franz
Introduction
During the summer of 2005, while standing on top of the dump of Area A-5, I had a conversation with the director of the Hazor excavation, Dr. Amnon Ben Tor. He asked me why most Christian pilgrims and tourists visit Megiddo, but not Hazor. I responded that there were two reasons. The first reason is logistics. The pilgrim / tourist lands at Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv and spend the first night in either Tel Aviv or Natanya. The next day they head for Nazareth and the Sea of Galilee. Megiddo is just off the road on the way to Nazareth, so they stop there. The second reason is its Biblical connection. Megiddo is mentioned in Revelation 16:16 as Armageddon. With that, Amnon said, “Find me a New Testament connection for Hazor!” I replied that I thought the Lord Jesus walked past the site on several occasions with His disciples. He said emphatically, “Write me an article!”
As I contemplated and researched this assignment, I came to the conclusion that Jesus walked past the ruins of Hazor with His disciples on their way to the region of Tyre and Sidon. But I wondered, “Why did Jesus take His disciples to the region of Tyre and Sidon?” There might have been a handful of Jewish people living in this predominately Gentile area that was outside the territory of Galilee. In fact, Josephus, the First Century Jewish historian comments that “among the Phoenicians the Tyrians, are notoriously our bitterest enemies” ( Against Apion 1:70, 71; LCL 1:191). That does not sound like a nice neighborhood to visit!
The accounts of this visit to Gentile territory can be found in Matt. 15:21-28 and Mark 7:24-30.
Theme
The Syro-Phoenician woman is used by the Lord Jesus as a test case to expose prejudice in the lives of the Twelve and then teach them a very valuable lesson concerning prejudice. The lesson is this: an exclusive mentality caused by pride; one that says we’re better than you, economically, ethnically, physically, religiously, can result in prejudice and could lead to partiality and discrimination.
Just prior to Jesus’s departure from the Sea of Galilee, He addressed the issue of defilement. His disciples asked Him about His comments. He answered them, “What comes out of a man, that defiles a man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness. All these things come from within and defile a man” (Mark 7:20-23). Jesus then gave a vivid lesson to His disciples about pride that came to fruition as prejudice.
Matthew and Mark are the only gospel writers that record this event. Mark, hearing this account from Peter, would have recorded it because this was a lesson Peter had to learn the hard way. Even though he was an apostle to the circumcision, Peter came to realize that salvation was for all, both Jews and Gentiles. Mark was also writing to a Jewish audience in Rome. Both record this event because they may have included this event in order to provoke their Jewish audience to jealousy when they realize Gentiles can be part of the Kingdom of God as well (Rom. 11:11, 12).
The Geographical and Historical Setting
Matthew and Mark both record that Jesus and the Twelve departed to the “region of Tyre and Sidon” (Matt. 15:21; Mark 7:24, 31). Commentators are divided as to whether Jesus and His disciples actually visited these Phoenician cities or they just stepped out of Galilee into the region of Tyre. If it’s the latter, they could have gone up the Hulah Valley, just past the ancient city of Hazor and headed up the hill toward Kedesh of Naphtali. Josephus says that Kedesh, or Kedasa, as it was known in the First century, was “a Tyrian village” ( Wars 2:459; LCL 2: 503). The fact that Sidon is mentioned by the gospel writers seems to indicate that they went deeper into Tyrian territory than just stepping outside of Galilee.
http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/article/5052
Have you heard of "second wife" syndrome? That is when you don't really love the person but you want to feel close to them and tag along on that young man's relational journey for it's entire duration. You try to get as close as you can and maybe you might even hope to have a liaison that is quite unadvisable in the end. You ask what is he going to do when his wife sniffs your eau "duh!" toilette on his year 2056 egg marketing uniform and you will ultimately leave when the opportunity of being the wife has come. You go and find another family on which you can sit as a subconscious antichrist and play the parasite. You resent the family unit as it is quite evident in the end. You did not forgive your full time father for failing to show up at a ballet presentation while he was out of town on an emergency call due to that egg truck spill disaster. Please forgive. When you grew up, you got the emotions right and you wiggle in to get a father's attention( a father in another woman's family) but you just need to believe you can have that man of your own with whom you can get the emotions and the commitment right although stolen waters are sweet(google that); innit? Your father was not cheating on you and nor did he break a commitment to you as there was another ballet or piano recital a few months later but he was working(his commitment to you) so that you could be so refined and forgiving in the end(like right now today!) but most importantly thankful. You shouldn't have vowed to never have children when he did not show up or to never have a family. The girl next to you on the escalator was in a single parent home and asked God for a husband and children. Her husband is the man with whom you cheated; innit? It is rather sad really. It is just not on.
So, it says that there are many antichrists that shall come. There are many people being abused repeatedly by people who seem to think it is their role to kill, steal from someone and destroy them. Is this your experience? Has someone used your essays? If it is your experience as a sojourner, then you have your proof that the bible resonates in what you have chosen to believe.
Thursday, 10 September 2015
The Equality Movement. It is just soo emotional.
It is evident that when you are dead, there is no one there to approve of you from the building where you were living or from grad school unless your version of death means they can see where you went on that passage into the after life. You might have died on the birthing room table. You might have died during an American football game but if you are alive, is it really to hurt people to feel authority or to create victims so that you can have some sense of power? When do you take time to be thankful for what you survived and share the thankfulness instead of trying to ensure that other people who are already eternally thankful since 4 or 17 years old will know your experiences as if they do not have some experience of their own? But, maybe people might tell bad stories about you and say you were gay or just okay or gay and okay. Do you watch the news? A few genuine essay writers have died in the last few hours. This is also true of some the essay thieves in the world and there are just too many for it to make any sense. But, maybe you can catch them if you can; innit? It's just that when you are dead, you find that you are in a state where you really can't see how people feel about you and all that you did in killing, stealing, diseasing and destroying to hurt people who did not want to join in what you call your equality movement as their neighborhood block had a few more trees and the houses did not have the nice, new plastic windows like yours.
What does "gay" mean anyway?
It would have been a great equality movement, death, if it wasn't soo emotional and had more humane substance to it. It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
What does "gay" mean anyway?
It would have been a great equality movement, death, if it wasn't soo emotional and had more humane substance to it. It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
So, once we get over marveling at this amazing communication technology called TV, we can get back to communicating the message, purposes and need for safe society; the safe society that made the development of this technology possible.
We could just make sitcoms and dramas based on biblical scenarios but dramatized in the modern world with subways, highways and shopping malls. Every episode or communication would have a life saving moral.
We could just make sitcoms and dramas based on biblical scenarios but dramatized in the modern world with subways, highways and shopping malls. Every episode or communication would have a life saving moral.
It is not very clear how many have died in the world because a school friend thought of their old friend's potential, but "fear of potential" is possibly a motive for a lot of hurtful happenings in someone's life. But, I don't really know what to say; so sad! It is just that potential is not probability and maybe they should review their own school notes and work instead of worrying about any old friend becoming top milk producer in Idaho where milk is so emotional and political.
An uncontrolled little child with a razor blade and lots of resentment in a class room designed to instill the virtues of civil society can do a lot of harm to people in little ways and make the whole entire class room experience redundant before or after people graduate. It is just not on. Who are they?
An uncontrolled little child with a razor blade and lots of resentment in a class room designed to instill the virtues of civil society can do a lot of harm to people in little ways and make the whole entire class room experience redundant before or after people graduate. It is just not on. Who are they?
A girlfriend was having sex for cash. She was very resentful of anyone who did not know what that is and was adamant that they should. She was also very resentful of a Diesel watch purchased by her boyfriend that had a 100 year battery. It was only $89.99 but it meant that he did not have to buy a battery every year or every two years at $12.99. He bought it at Amazon.luv or .com I think and it was a chronograph. There was a second hand stop watch function as found on many watches; really cool. His uncle bought the Seiko version and was very happy actually although it used rather different mechanizing or isms. Oh well. Her issue with the watch is that held on to ex boyfriend who was not unfaithful and respected her wishes. He asked permission to attend a friend's prom and he did. She heard stories about the night suggesting that he had sexual relations but this was not true. She chose not to believe him. He let go and dated whom was interested in dating him and who did not seem to smoke as far as he knew. He wanted children some day; you see? Any way the girl who wished to believe any one other than him held on to the young man for years as if she needed something. This is so even though she got married and must have been with 100's of other people maybe just to fit in. She must have thought his death was the only way to let him go. Borrowing his essays made her desire for finality more pressing once she found out he was running a Lox and bagel advice line with a little website. She actually showed up a year after the initial break up where he had, in fact, moved on and she decided to request his hand in dating again. He said; "...NO; my girlfriend is white Dutch and we might never get married and if we do, we might get divorced as many Christians do these days according to the stats, but maybe we can be friends as I do not like wasting energy." Is that ok? (not "is that a gay?")
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
So, in some relational contexts you cannot love anyone enough; that is love them enough so that they would actually love themselves and quit burdening anyone they date or anyone with whom they've mated with their need for constant assurance that they are lovable. They would break up in fear of being left or rejected simply because someone suggests your husband is feeling a bit updated with his A+ New Balance running shoes. You bought the darn shoes as his wife. Why are you soo jumpy and willing to do anything that old lady says to you or respond to kind comments about your ,uh, husband. Women and men who seek this constant assurance are seeking an unconditional love that only Christ can give...and it is possible to actually enter that feeling. Say you are a person walking in the faith of Abraham repeatedly and the fight and tug to divide your soul goes away. You will never watch that double souled sitcom again. Hell on earth is when you can't believe it, you are feeling alone and you decide to spit in anyone's food around you so that you can try to feel a closeness of another kind while you resent the word of God all day. You could have just forgiven yourself for cheating on someone you said you loved and remain thankful for the family and children that you have. That sense of unconditional love is real but why would you leave it or that experience? It is not for your spouse or partner to carry that burden of unconditional love. Let us pray they do forgive you as they wish to be forgiven. Cheating on people hurts the cheater as well as the cheated. The bible is in every child. As such, Jesus is a celebration of community, civil society and humane treatment. A human life or donkey cannot supersede the misunderstanding of the authority. Love your neighbor as you would your self and love the Lord. You don't need to understand a community of decidedly abusive people who may have been raised in single parent homes or maybe not but who think it is fun to live in a nexus of a group notion of hurting or an identity they create that causes them to hold on to that group identity above and beyond any hope of settling with someone they claim to love. It could be a LEGO(TM)culture or group identity that begins with a Baptist Sunday School and then adds notions from pop culture as they are presented as they are presented in the media. You see Training Day or the Color Purple and then all of a sudden you are being told this is definitively "your culture" and anything in between the movie and the Baptist Sunday School should be pretty okay. Anyone you believe should understand is to be abused and killed as some kind of issue or threat but you are cheating and hurting people on notions that make very little logical sense if you believe in a love that can be unconditional and a home environment that does not have to be divisive. Maybe Leave It To Beaver can be an Add-on. Maybe the Color Purple has nothing to do with your mother's land and culture. She might be Hyderabad Orphan from the West Indies and you are being raised in America so why are you being pressured to adopt an experience or a sexuality that has nothing to do with you except that people want you to know the experience and possibly also live it so that you don't feel unequal to, that is above or free from their amazing experiences. The laws of your land and the bible carries a promise that is usually and purposefully color blind. You can understand problems and solutions as having non-descript variables. As such, read Ecclesiastes 4.
Wednesday, 9 September 2015
Some one said in a discussion some where that the Star Wars(TM) is about a will to bring an empire into existence and an end to democratic forms of representation but the empire was never lost. But, what about representation to present the souls of the people that is expressed with their raised practice of the hands?
Tuesday, 8 September 2015
"You have to show more interest or else I will not resist the opportunity to put myself into a capsule and jettison my self into the ocean and I will take you with me as I am gay. You have show more interest in our culture..."; she said.
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
Sunday, 6 September 2015
So, apparently ww1 post war fatherlessness provided some of the sociological background and milieu that tilled the fertile ground for a swastika( bent cross) national father ( fuhrer) culture. In a similar format, the post "love hangover/sexual revolution" fatherless culture that is some how correlated with and provided fertile ground for the gay rainbow movement as symbolized by the antagonist in "The Passion For The Christ".
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
It is the continuing policy of Londinium TV Channel to discuss everything in a light hearted manner and to let everyone know that homosexuals are human beings. It is also to share the gospel. They should be as well respected in public as any bible believing Christian. Hatred is not tolerated against homosexuals and nor should anyone tolerate anyone, including homosexuals, perpetrating crimes of anger, passions and violence.
Warren Lyon, Editor.
Londinium TV Channel.
Saturday, 5 September 2015
Black People have been playing Strange Fruit and Othello for centuries now...so let us sing the popular refrain "...We shall overcome, we shall overcome, we shall overcome, our selves and our own community some day."
It is rumored that a number of refugee populations in the early 1990's reached a certain critical mass to allow for further incubation and cultural dissemination. This is evidenced in movies such as Menace To Society and the Hip- Pop song called OPP(Other People's Property). It is quite amazing though really since it meant any property was at risk of being used. The suggestion is that within a certain ethno-cultural appearance, your property is subject to being used to further the aspirations of other individuals such that you are not an individual but someone who is a part of what is called "they all look alike/they are all the same" and they are not entitled to individuality or independence. If you try to be independent or obtain a scholarship, you may end up dead and rolled up in a carpet in a school gym at 16. This is a society that provides free schooling for 17+ years and it should be hoped that a certain degree of cultural transmission by the educational providers should ensue. This can certainly involve references to Egyptian mathematics. It is obvious that Pythagoras had to be a student of a theorem that predated his time on this earth, his travels and studies since the pyramids are centuries older and are evidence of the theory's architectural function. Much of the knowledge of Egypt was translated and disseminated into the larger world via ancient libraries at Alexandria. The anger expressed against anyone who follows the syllabus and who had faith in being able to participate in the educational process is quite remarkable. No one understands the anger or its persistence. It is as if someone sees the willingness to participate in the process as abandonment from the group. But Harriet Tubman died a long time ago and she would not understand this nonsense either except that the angry individuals are indicative of another populace and origin. It is not entirely clear why this may be but it seems that if you are found using other individual's materials, you are asked to buy the pass with your full frontal assets at less than street corner rates. The only message being communicated is whoredom instead of Judeo-Christian or civil society that is always inclusive of all cultures and communities.
Why.....??
http://www.psmag.com/politics-and-law/parents-murder-children-75578
Advertisement — Continue reading below
Why Do Parents Murder Their Children?
Like everyone else, academics seem a bit mystified. Even Darwin's explanation is kind of weak.
- Avatar:
- Author:
- Ryan Jacobs
- Publish date:
- Social count:
- 3
Like everyone else, academics seem a bit mystified. Even Darwin's explanation is kind of weak.
Approximately 500 children in the U.S. are murdered by their parents annually. The morbid acts have accounted for 2.5 percent of total homicides in the country between 1976 and 2007.*
There is not much research on the topic—perhaps because academics are hesitant to burrow down such a dark, esoteric hole—and what does exist is often limited by small samples or a case-study approach. In what researchers are calling "the first comprehensive analysis of U.S. filicide," Timothy Y. Mariano, a third-year psychiatry medical resident at Brown University's Alpert Medical School, and his colleagues crunched FBI data on 15,691 such cases during a 32-year period to provide a clearer picture of the crime.**
"As far as death by homicide goes, you’re more likely to be killed on the day you are born than on any other day of your life."
According to the study, recently published in Forensic Science International, victims are frequently unable to put up a fight: 33 percent are less than a year old, and more than 38 percent of them are between one and six. As filicide researcher Phillip Resnick once toldTime: "As far as death by homicide goes, you’re more likely to be killed on the day you are born than on any other day of your life." Murdering sons was more common (58.3 percent of the cases) than murdering daughters (41.7 percent), and almost 90 percent of the victims were biological children.
As for the perpetrators, both fathers and mothers were nearly equally as likely to murder their own infants. But fathers were much more likely than mothers to murder their adult children (in those cases, 78.3 percent of the offenders were male). Moms were more likely to be younger (on average, around the age of 27), and fathers were older (nearly 35). "Most common killing methods included using hands and feet, strangulation, beating, asphyxiation, drowning, and defenestration," the researchers write.
Advertisement — Continue reading below
But why? Theories span from mental health to evolution ("Darwin suggested that infanticide was a check on human population growth"). The most common motive cited among perpetrators is altruism: because of "real or imagined suffering," the act is "in the child’s best interests."
What kind of theories do the data support?
- Mental health and serotonin levels appear to be key. Animal research shows that decreases in serotonin can lead to the behavior, and increases can decrease it. Most of the perpetrators were "between 18 and 30 years old," a stage of life associated with neurotransmitter disturbances like depression and schizophrenia.
- Sex hormones can drive the behavior, and the level of violence. Animal research shows that higher testosterone levels correlate positively with killing offspring. "In the dataset, men comprised the preponderance of offenders, were older, and were more likely to use firearms, whereas women tended to use means that excluded wounding violence."
- Evolution. Eliminating the youngest of the brood, the researchers write, "can confer certain evolutionary advantages" by allowing a parent to direct resources to healthier or more capable young. "The dataset showed that infants are at greatest risk of filicide, which tended to be perpetrated by biological mothers. Relatively few resources have been invested in an infant relative to an older child, so this type of filicide may reflect resource competition."
*UPDATE — July 21, 2014: The original version of this post cited 3,000 annual cases, accounting for 15 percent of total homicides. These numbers were the result of inaccurate data filtering by the scientists, and the new numbers reflect the correct figures.
**UPDATE — July 21, 2014: The original version of this post cited 94,146 such cases. As above, this number was due to inaccurate data filtering by the scientists.
http://www.psmag.com/politics-and-law/parents-murder-children-75578
You can use someone's essays or intellectual property in the risk and you can pay your tuition which is forfeit upon completion of the course but this does not mean your risk entitles you to graduate since you will be found out. Why don't you reference the materials and get a good grade for referencing the authority of those various published works inclusive of blogs? You can create your original thesis that is supported by three separate arguments. Buttress it with many references. Use Lazie, Strunk and White. The thesis is anything you believe you can substantiate. Read an article or your lecture notes for inspiration. Why risk and resent? You can use a word processor with with dual core chip, change your mistakes instantly, spell check, dictate it and you don't need the eraseo- tape in the old type writer.
Friday, 4 September 2015
Romans 2.
If you want to cheat on your spouse or have sex for cash, that is totally up to you. Who is judging you? You could ask your children how they feel though. Maybe some people will need God's grace and may find it necessary to join you in a world full of broken promises and un-applied laws or legislation. But, if they don't join you don't judge them as perfectionists. Don't be angry with them. Let them have their peace as no one is judging you.
Romans 2.
If you want to cheat on your spouse or have sex for cash, that is totally up to you. Maybe some people will need God's grace and may find it necessary to join you in a world full of broken promises and un-applied laws or legislation. But, if they don't join you don't judge them as perfectionists. Don't be angry with them. Let them have their peace as no one is judging you.
Wednesday, 2 September 2015
Tuesday, 1 September 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)