So, lets just say this. If you're white, why don't you just act like it? Let society work as expected without such open breach of rules that amount to terrorism.

So, lets just say this. If you're white, why don't you just act like it?  Let society work as expected without such open breach of rules that amount to terrorism.  There is one other issue.  Maybe Louis the 16th and his brother and his brother's gay boyfriend did a "Mission Impossible" in light of an impending revolution.     This is where the masquerade culture began.
They dressed up three people already designated for the guillotine as the three Kings or three musketeers and took a slow boat to Martinique.  It is very quiet there.

There is dna that should speak French to confirm its quiet confidence instead of screaming for acknowledgement and presuming a social authority that, in its own self definition, does not need to understand anything, finish exams or evaluations as it wishes to break rules as an expression of their belief to a genetic right to be above general society instead of fulfill the rules that decidedly keep all participants in society safe.    This pattern eventually leads to dependence on another population as  the middle managers tell you what you wish to believe in your drug maintained supposition of superiority.   No matter what, we do not elect criminals with 39000 pending felonies but you could certainly play the "game of Life" without rules if you want but who owes you anything?  This dna supports rebellions.  The first time this came to the fore was in 1776 with a rebellion against a quiet application of rules as evidenced in the arrest of British soldiers who shot colonialists contrary to communal peace. If Hamilton was from St. Croix and was able to achieve social and political ascendance, then there was a sufficient number of West Indian Creole individuals to support him sufficiently.  Who was he really? He seems to have been French speaking and a conspirator against English civil administration and English hegemony not just in America but in the entire new world; the type of hegemony that ensures its representatives will go to court to explain the shooting of civilians.  Is there a rebellion against the established foundations of America; rebelloin that is asking America and the world to  tolerate a Commander in Chief who will bring to exposure, by negligence, vital and sensitive correspondence(30000+ emails and documents) to the detriment of the American public and who expects this to be ignored without penalty?  This person is not capable of respecting positional expectations or security requirements. He who is faithful with little will be faithful with much.  Let's say she is white.  I say she is officially white and she does not need to prove her whiteness any longer or hope it is confirmed by seeking forgiveness for such negligence. If she is white, shall the people have to accept this from a candidate? Why are they still on the ballet?   In England, white politicians in office step down  and are removed from seeking further office when their secretaries or underlings embarrass the government or if they personally leave their secure briefs in the pub or if they use yahoo mail to send secure information wittingly or unwittingly. This individual is liable to 10 years for each email that was negligently transmitted through insecure, unofficial methods. How many people have died with their identities exposed because of it? Being a former governor who exposed national secrets does not make a good former governor.  It tells how you will treat secure information.  You were not faithful with the little duties although you want to be trusted with something grand.  This is a job and not a hereditary title to the throne of Israel, Even if it was, your father already told you to return the cash you stole from his small business.   The other issue is as follows; one or two credible candidates did not get to participate, one candidate attended who is a certified candidate, and the other with 30000 missing or improperly transmitted emails attended the debate with a red painted face,a long tail and horns on their head.  Somehow, the whole world should know the right answer by now.  




















There is another King in French history who managed, enforced rules and maintained society for the greatest, mutual peace and the prowess of French influence and culture grew with Paris as a city set on a hill as a light to the world.  He is Louis the 13.  There was certainty and consistency in the application of rules as it drew people from all over the world to its marvels of civilization.