Who wants a driver-less car? It was suggested on tv show called "What will they think of next?" and a great deal of research has helped to develop technology for unmanned planes that reduces the risk of the loss of life in military scenarios. Google has spent significant funds on this research and this is excellent. They will have commercial value when you can send the vehicle to pick up groceries. There are other functions but drivers, as human beings, buy gas and groceries. Bus drivers buy vehicles, gas and groceries. A driver-less vehicle, if not specifically designed for military purposes, does not recognize that the purpose of the car is the human being that is driving it and that being is a consumer. The driver-less car could help individuals who may need mobility as disabled individuals. This is an excellent commercial function. But, the machine cannot supplant its purpose of serving the consumer human being. The designer of the machine knows this because he needs to make sales. Humans are buyers. If it is not this way, the machines might become self-activated with AI and in the last war, we can look at the machines or a mirror, see our own reflection and see that we are fighting ourselves; after all! The greatest enemy is within; yah? Military pilots and drivers are consumers as well and the risks they take are rewarded accordingly. School bus drivers are consumers also. All consumers finance vehicle purchases for their family or they buy used Cadillacs and Corvettes, buy pizzas and cruises and we need many more of them as they also buy new 1tb laptops every five years to stay socially current and accepted. If they don't buy new machines, people burn remotely the second-hand machines that the consumer kept using beyond their stylish date of six months. The machines were used beyond their stylish date to save money for that cruise or to purchase a 2017 driver-less vehicle. This is so whether or not they have a cheek cut from a year old that is not soo visible.
No comments:
Post a Comment