Search This Blog

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Do not have batteries like your current vehicle; really!

Here is a recent article from AOL on fuel cells. There is clearly no question about efficiency. Hydrogen is 3x more efficient and there is no question that there are zero emissions when hydrogen is used as fuel.  The only question is  distribution or infrastructure but if you wish to sell bread on a mass scale, then you call an existing supermarket chain, Costco, TESCO or EXXON.  They have a distribution network and effective existing infrastructure to sell not only fuel including hydrogen but one that is engaged in supplying various consumer goods including aspirin, eggs, bread, disposable kodak cameras, cheetos and lots of coffee.  They also sell fuel and it is doubtless that there is sufficient space on current station grounds for installation of hydrogen pumps everywhere. More importantly, energy companies that sell fuel( various types of fuel) with these convenient locations for the sale of aspirin, condoms and coffee, do not manufacture vehicles. They only provide fuel for them.  A tanner cannot dictate to a shoe company such as Loakes or Church shoes, what leather is to be used or what type of sole is to be commandeered in the design of the shoe; can they?  If all the vehicles are hydrogen fuelled, then the energy companies must adapt.  I like the Lexus FCVR(Hydrogen fuel cell) super car.  Here is a link to its picture and the engine noise (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOVFQH1l5zg&feature=related).  This may be the non-hydrogen version but the styling is the same and both powertrains are available to consumers who, like all democracy loving individuals who are full of perspicacity, they love choice and shun any communist market notion that would prevent choice or that would, by way of example, prevent every citizen from having full milk and honey offered at all fast food chains with their coffee.  That would be unusual; very unusual.   
  • You are here: 
  • Cars > 
  • Articles > 
  • Techsplanation: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles
A A A



























  • Google +

  • To scientists, running vehicles on hydrogen makes all the sense in the world. Hydrogen can be derived from so many different things, including water, and constitutes roughly 75 percent of the universe's chemical elemental mass.

    Consumers, however, often shy up when presented with the option of a hydrogen-powered vehicle. They think of "H-bombs," or the explosion of the Hindenburg. But that's pretty silly when you consider we handle 15 to 25 gallons of highly volatile gasoline in our vehicles now.

    As the U.S. struggles politically and culturally to map out a logical energy future, hydrogen doesn't get a lot of attention. Most of the talk is about battery-powered electric vehicles and gas-electric hybrids that can run on either gasoline, electricity, or a combination of both simultaneously. But to mark Earth Day 2012, we want to shed some light on perhaps the most abundant energy solution of all for our vehicles – hydrogen.

    What is it?

    A fuel-cell vehicle is a type of electric vehicle. Like the Nissan Leaf and other EVs, it uses an electric motor to drive the wheels. But rather than draw electricity from heavy batteries that take time to recharge, a fuel cell generates electricity as needed by creating a chemical reaction using hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen is stored onboard the car in tanks as a compressed gas and the oxygen comes from the air. A fuel-cell vehicle can be refueled by pumping hydrogen into its tank at a hydrogen refueling station, similar to a regular gas station.

    While fuel cell vehicles are still considered advanced technology, the science is not new. Fuel cells were developed in the NASA space program in the 1960's and the first fuel-cell vehicle, the Chevrolet Electrovan, was built by General Motors in 1966. At the time, the fuel cells were too big and costly to even dream of deploying in a production version. But much has changed in the past five decades, as sophisticated computer control systems have allowed the size of fuel cells to shrink along with the costs. Modern demonstration vehicles have been logging miles since the 1990s, though automakers' interest in the technology has waxed and waned over the ensuing years.

    Techsplanation recently drove a Mercedes-Benz F-Cell fuel-cell vehicle (See video). The system is built into the Mercedes B-Class. This F-Cell has an electric engine rated at 100 kW (134 horsepower), and a range of about 250 miles. This improvement in range over an earlier version is due in part to the B-Class's greater space for holding the compressed hydrogen tanks and higher storage pressure.

    We so enjoyed driving the F-Cell around Los Angeles, with such ease of refilling the tank when we needed, that we keep asking ourselves: Why can't we have this now in larger numbers?
    How does it work?

    A fuel cell works by catalyzing hydrogen, a fancy way of saying a chemical reaction breaks down hydrogen atoms into their atomic components: electrons and protons. The electrons create an electric current – that's where the electric power comes from – before they're recombined with the protons and oxygen from the air to create water, the fuel cell's only emission.

    A fuel cell is comprised of several hundreds of these cells, wired together to create the full system large enough to power the vehicle's electric motor, just like a battery.

    Fuel cell cars have an actual battery in them as well, usually a lithium-ion one like in your laptop computer. The vehicle uses this battery to store energy from regenerative braking, just as in a battery electric vehicle or a hybrid like the Toyota Prius. Because the fuel cell vehicle is powered by an electric motor, that motor can regenerate electricity any time the vehicle is decelerating. It does this by allowing the wheels to spin the electric motor, rather than the other way around. The motor then acts like a generator, returning electric current to the battery. Of course, a computer controls this entire process, as well as deciding when the motor should draw its power from the fuel cell, the battery, or both.

    Why would I want it?

    The big reason to want fuel cell vehicles is it doesn't produce any harmful emissions. That's right, no carbon monoxide, no carbon dioxide, no nitrogen oxides, none of the traditional tailpipe emissions associated with internal combustion engines. Zip. Nada.

    Fuel-cell vehicles improve upon battery electrics because they are theoretically just as convenient to operate as a gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicle. When a battery EV runs low on charge, it can take quite some time – often hours – to recharge. But a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle can have its tanks refilled in a matter of minutes, just like a gasoline engine.

    Is there any downside?

    The biggest issue facing fuel-cell adoption is there's virtually no hydrogen refueling infrastructure anywhere in the world. We filled up our tank at a station in Los Angeles as part of a pilot program. While we have more than 100,000 gas stations in the United States, you can count the number of hydrogen refueling stations on your fingers.

    There's also the question of where the hydrogen would come from. Hydrogen needs to be manufactured by extracting it from other substances, like water, natural gas or coal. Heck, you can even crack hydrogen from gasoline, but we don't want to go down that road. These processes have their own energy cost and associated emissions that can blur the picture of just how "green" fuel-cell vehicles are. However, given that the U.S. has abundant stores of natural gas, it is the most logical fuel stock for hydrogen in the near term.

    Then there's cost. Estimates have pegged the cost to build each 2008 Honda FCX Clarity fuel cell vehicle in the six figures. While the FCX Clarity is a first-generation purpose-built fuel cell vehicle, Mercedes has recently stated its expectation that costs of so-called second-generation hydrogen fuel cell vehicles will come down. Mercedes forecasts that by 2014 they might be comparable to the cost of diesel hybrids, which while still expensive, would be feasible for carmakers to build and sell at a profit.

    What vehicles offer it?

    The thing about cars powered by fuel cells is that there aren't many of them. Honda launched the first purpose-built, publicly available fuel cell car in 2007, the FCX Clarity. But only a handful of cars have been sold – just 30 to date – and their availability has been restricted to leases in Southern California. Honda did this because the cars cost far more to build than the $600/month lease price will cover, and the limited number of hydrogen refueling stations means the cars can't be sold just anywhere.

    The Mercedes-Benz F-Cell was launched in late 2010, and used a similar leasing program to put its cars in the hands of the public. These cars, based on a European model called the B-Class, were also restricted to California customers, for similar reasons. Mercedes has said it plans to lease a total of 200 F-Cell cars globally, although through 2011, 20 cars had been delivered here in the U.S.

    These two car programs are only a small step beyond experimental, but that's not deterring car-makers from moving forward with plans to put more fuel cell vehicles on the road. General Motors, Toyota, and Hyundai have all announced plans to start producing fuel-cell vehicles within the next two to three years. The technology is just too smart for them not to keep pushing the costs down. And there is widespread agreement – outside the oil industry – the U.S. must, for the sake of its environment and national security, diversify our transportation fuel stock beyond oil.

    Bottom line

    Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles have been perpetually a decade away from the mainstream for 20 years. That could change, as automakers have gotten serious about developing alternatives to the internal combustion engine in recent years.

    If you get a chance to drive a fuel-cell vehicle, take it. You will be driving the future, and you may just be part of a wave that brings the future a bit closer to the present.

    Quick Shopping Tools:


    Research New Cars



    All Models


    Cars for Sale in Your Area


    All Models


    Add a Comment

    *0 / 3000 Character Maximum

    1 Comment

    Filter by:
    Aurelio Czargb Ramos It is misleading to say that because of hydrogen's abundance, energy available in the form of hydrogen is abundant. Hydrogen in compressed, stored and isolated form is only as abundant as whatever OTHER energy sources are used to obtain it in such state. Separating hydrogen from water takes no less energy than the energy recovered during hydrogen fuel cell use. Fuel cells make outstanding batteries. they are not sources of energy.
    Monday at 11:28 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

    ABUSE REPORT
    From:

    Your Comment:
    Send Report Cancel

    Advertisement

    AOL Autos for iPhone

    Need an Auto Loan?

    We Can Help!
    Presented By Apply In One Easy Step »

    Research A New Car

    Find A Used Car


    FIND A GREAT USED CAR

    Just Say - SHOW ME THE CARFAX
    Order Carfax Report
    Powered by
    Get a free CARFAX record check for a used car
    Go >>
    Follow AOL Autos on Twitter










    Monday, 2 July 2012

    The songs "girlfriend" by Prince and Bieber are indicative of a new gender confusion related to bisphenol A-essentially estrogen- in the food supply unnecessarily but formulaically but also these songs will still manifest, express, connote and denote the obvious point that all red blooded football players want to treat someone with the same kindness in frienship with which they wish to be treated.   Every corn fed young woman, fatted in the right places, understands this and even more so as a bible college graduate. Now, the canon of tobacco cases about products that effect reproduction will help us to filter out the unnecessary spices in the plastic and its effects because no one wants to hear about the female humpback whales that have lost the desire or tendency to reproduce.

    Wednesday, 13 June 2012

    There has to be something awry manifesting innit?

    If you see two male Gorillas  or two female lionesses getting it on sexually, you would think something is going on that is inexplicable.  But, if they have social graces and are compassionate with gentle tendencies to most every other animal in the jungle, it is excusable and tolerable; right? Well, read MATTHEW 19, Romans 2 and Acts 8.


    Sunday, 10 June 2012

    Jesus in Contempt?-not really.

    If you disobey a civil court order, you can be held in contempt of court which my include enforcement of orders confirming your contempt with fines and imprisonment as the punishment.  But Jesus was not the benefit of natural justice and was taken away by the gestapo authorities in the middle of the night without any order involved.  The Jews of Nazi Germany may empathise with Christ's experience.  However, in our modern court system following the experiences of John the Baptist and Guy Faulkes, you certainly have a moral responsibility to address directly and not to obey an unjust law because we still need justice and so we refuse to accept such laws and repeal them but John the Baptist knows that, in spite of the law, there is authority and authority said he would have to go as he addressed directly what he felt was contemptous to the law ( ten commandments-thou shall not kill or covet but honor and keep your covenants(promises)).

    So in  maintaining the covenants outlined in the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights( a modern interpretation of the Magna Carta) and the one that says teach the golden rule,  we have magnanimity.  This means that all modern court proceedings, including contempt proceedings,  also maintain the principles contained therein-magna carta-including the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Verily, they are to be conducted in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice and to permit  a reasonable and respectable time to prepare a full answer, even at a trial by right,  to the allegements and to call any witnesses that may aid the court in its duty to ensure justice as opposed to "Will".  This is also "Spanish Inquisition" avoidance and even if you did smoke weed in the sixties, it doesn't mean that you have the right to demand your tonka toys NOW and flip the "bird" to every symbol of authority you associate with those who deprived you of such toys way back then in your formative years; right?

    Well, he wasn't really in contempt. Read Mark 3 and John 5. He just wanted to fulfill the law and the prophets including Malachi chapter 2 and Hosea chapter 2 and 3.

    By Warren A. Lyon, Political Scientist, Lawyer, Essayist.



    Marxism, Capitalism, Tomato or Tomaato via authoritative facilitation


    Marxism,  Capitalism, Tomato or Tomaato via authoritative facilitation

    If creativity is a function of imagination, then stifling creativity is to stifle imagination. If creativity can aid diversity and diversity is the twin of choice in markets, at restaurants and store shelves, then maybe people will be happy with MORE OF IT because they seem to like choice as in Aim(tm) vs Crest(tm).  If they are happy, they may buy more stuff. Its nice to have at least two different types of pens or paper clips to choose from in the stock room at the office or at least two colas on the store shelf; just for that sense of freedom.
      As an expression of this evident creativity in all, Dr. George Washington Carver(google) developed Peanut Butter and was harassed for many years by Mr. Skippy, Mr. Jif and Mr. Kraft. Carver Peanut butter was never founded but Dr. Carver received many royalties for his inventions and awards if not just the respect alone which was often the only currency amongst those who really could not trade anything else among those who really could not trade anything else.  Dr. Carver, however, chose to hang around those who sought community and love over and above respect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svCGe8rJukACreativity and choice are the hallmarks of every good market. If you stifle these, you have neither Marxism or capitalism because creativity is a natural expression of one's innate gifting and personality and is essentially natural. If stifled, then you have something unnatural and the ants and mice and human beings will behave accordingly with only one type of cheese on the shelf. But authority can safeguard and maximise this creativity. If stifled in one sector, be it energy or even the bathroom soap sector, it will bring the doldrums and stagnation. I like Pears(TM) because it is umm natural. This is the Bedouin market every day of the week and this is the farmer's market. All the eggs are the same at the farmer's market so only price and quantity for the said price, not quality, will dictate sales. But, all the cookies and pies are not the same with different recipes, creativity and ingredients and here quality, in addition to price, will dictate the sale. I like Duncan Hines for its consistent quality, efficiency, cost savings and time effectiveness; at your local grocers now.  Marxism tends to be very Christian or natural after all because it heralds the virtues of ones innate giftings, creativity and imagination where stifling the same is inherently ungodly.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQWbqeYsqp8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7sYNptYjsE&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O-o5gwi4HI&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Dg2HKMFsers&feature=endscreen

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNlLhrqEy_c&feature=slpl

    By Warren A. Lyon, Political Scientist, Lawyer, Essayist.

    Friday, 11 May 2012

    Londinium TV!

    What is a paradigm in comparison to a parachute?  Londinium TV!

    What is a Paraclete? Londinium TV!

    Now we all make mistakes and everybody knows Benjamin Franklin was one of the more popular founding fathers to write a book on Masonry, the question is what happens if you start a new company on the notion of a Theistic order but negate it by giving everybody in the company the right to pursue their own definition of success or happiness?  Can a company that is divided stand successfully? Is it not fraught in its corporate articles with inherent confusion of purpose and division? Who is the CEO?  It seems that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness ends up with the goal of happiness being the pursuit of self, the worship of self which negates or subverts a submission to any other force, purpose or mind whether it be a collective mind or, for example, the omnipotent mind of Godly reason or Godly wisdom.  No two people are likely to define happiness in the same way unless there are external measures in which to quantify the object that one can obtain in that pursuit like a more efficient vehicle http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIDpCT1tOqE or laundry soap.  At the end of the day, the pursuit of happiness is the pursuit of self.  But is there something that is agreed upon commonly within a mutual pursuit such as emission free energy or the most abundant source domestically available to avoid $20 billion payments per month to foreign sources?  Digging more holes domestically also could not have within it or any new hole any solution since you can dry mix diesel fuel or gasoline as you do cement.  Any Chemistry graduate with a three or four year degree can make your family enough dry mixed carbon free gas in a few ten pound bags for an entire year without equivocation.  It is possible because with God all things are possible.  Duncan Hines knows.  Does a ten pound bag make a really big biscuit?  I don't know. But it sounds as plausible as a Duncan Hines cake mix.  Any country set on that ordered paradigm  of the pursuit of self is caught  in a cycle of evident self-negation or nihilism.  What is nihilism? Well, google it.  Here you go.

    Nihilism (play /ˈn.ɨlɪzəm/ or /ˈn.ɨlɪzəm/; from the Latin nihil, nothing) is the philosophical doctrine suggesting the negation of one or more putatively meaningful aspects of life. Most commonly, nihilism is presented in the form of existential nihilism which argues that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value.[1] Moral nihilists assert that morality does not inherently exist, and that any established moral values are abstractly contrived. Nihilism can also take epistemological, metaphysical, or ontological forms, meaning respectively that, in some aspect, knowledge is not possible, or that contrary to popular belief, some aspect of reality does not exist as such.[clarification needed]
    The term nihilism is sometimes used in association with anomie to explain the general mood of despair at a perceived pointlessness of existence that one may develop upon realising there are no necessary norms, rules, or laws.[2]

    You see, I just watch TV but in similar fashion to TV, the internet is your tree of knowledge of good and evil and your mental diet is the same as the physical. You are what you eat.  Be careful how you take a bite.

    Saturday, 24 March 2012

    New Londinium TV

    This is to introduce Londinium TV with insights just as diverse and entertaining as a mcmuffin for $1.39 with real sausage and a free respectable newspaper with international contributors; rather exciting!  Enjoy various videos captured from the web and they are not offered to attract you to the site nor are they posted on the site directly but are links for direct connection to the service that made the videos available.  These videos are not posted on the internet directly by way of this television channel.  Watch on your phone or just listen before you go to bed. If the link appears here, it is understood that all questions as to video origin or otherwise are already addressed by the site which produced the link.