So we see the ''we the people of the cave'' who seek the freedom, independence and liberty of the cave are juxtaposed with the ''we the people of the entire world'' who seek the freedom of the constitution and the independence and liberty of the written document. Here lies the crux of the matter as to theory and practice in our socio-economics; in our experience with the discussions centred on our mutual societal experience. Here is the juxtaposition of the most guttural human hunt and gather culture running through every culture vs. the received, papered written culture of laws, rights and constitutions with tremendous technologies; our electric culture. In the impasse that might take place in the unresolved juxtaposition in any jurisdiction, people die and a revolving immigration with a reliance on other populations may ensue when the educated as to the laws and rules, either born and educated in the impasse jurisdiction or those who sought refuge or migrated and then who became educated, are attacked by those who are not educated as to the laws and rules of society and who seek other means and accesses of freedom and liberty. It is a silent civil war and in the gap, other communities and populations in other jurisdictions are relied upon where populations can thrive in the joy of the final answer with basic income. You will see culturally diverse neighborhoods disappear and become monolithic culturally. Torodo is an example of the emerging non-diverse monolithic as a glorious, very East Asian supported mining town that is to be juxtaposed with neighborhoods like Minneapolis St. Paul and Oklahoma where they do have a basic income sufficient to support merchants of any back ground who wish to open shops and run businesses if they choose to reflecting diverse cultures. In some impasse jurisdictions with a lot of residential and industrial building work, who do they intend will live in and buy the units in the buildings? The buyers seem to be Asian and who may get special multi-unit rates and that is matter of domestic economics when the buyers could have been North American if they had the basic income from the government's who operate the impasse jurisdiction. The end result in the impasse jurisdictions is that , personally, the developers building in places like Torodo are supporting some people, non-Asian people, in those impasse jurisdictions and carrying the economic burden with their own kind of social benefit above $40,000.00 when the burden, by legal right, is to be born by the government and maybe the developer could still support...his people if he wished to...with something maybe a bit less. Torodo, therefore, is an example of a jurisdiction where the impasse in the juxtaposition remains unanswered while the constitutional solution; the domestic and international human rights solution provides and sustains all involved and its really good if you are only minded to shop, eat and enjoy food and clothing primarily; maybe run a business. In all of this, there is one other issue and that is the connecting faith of all of these people. Some of us say we believe God is white and that is to bring God into the human realm as flesh; as an idol and it is divisive when God is a spirit and if your neighbor joined you with his own incarnation, he might say God is...Irish or God is man's best friend like a dog who comes when you call Him and none of this satisfies when God is not my human equal but Sovereign but it is best to leave Him without limiting definitions that do not satisfy ''Sovereign'' and say ''God is...'' See the final solution and the final answer. See the technology that all of God's creation are enjoying. They fail to see the airline passenger information terminal across the globe as the final answer. A Pakistani lady working in New Jersey knows your height and food preference on flights. She worked for the same airline, American Airlines, in Pakistan. You have been very busy putting your citizens into the fray for their civil liberties at home while recruiting for people to offer their lives to fight to defend these rights; yes at home and abroad while you court new immigrants to enjoy your promise of being the greatest nation or continent on earth but is anything they own in the greatest nation safe of he or she is an actual full exam full course graduate? The greatest proponents of ''them and us'' capitalism are only Americans who are really engaged in systemic questions while they feel preserved by a force vs. force mentality that says they will always be productive if they parasite on someone or something belonging to another to kill, steal and destroy. This has nothing to do with the skull and bones symbol as used by illustrious societies, pirates and the evil Nazi German SS alike but the fact that there are systemic answers to the questions at the finger tips and on the speed dial or right down the road on your information super highway so that you would see how the solution of basic income enables a treasure trove of economic activity that protects the most important variable, the human variable, in the economic equation as essential and gives breath to generated resources such as the return on capital investments so that even if you wanted to steal from people or from the system, there is something from where; there is a system from which one could steal as basic income does not mean human nature, sin and error that may be bent toward killing stealing and destroying is going away. Yet, the basic income is just some energy.. a little money guaranteed per citizen yearly, that is to say, to keep the wheels of the economic system turning round and round when there is less money per citizen on average due to the industrial automation. It is not a lot of money and it will be spent; $60,000.00 per year is proposed to see the European or the Asian economic buoyant escapade and just exactly what is happening in Some Parts of North America right now who have submitted to the UDHR in principle as not to be a rogue jurisdiction within a rogue state jurisdiction. So, who would seek acceptance from Europe and then hesitate to put in the final solution provided by Europe when acceptance by Europe is not based on physical attributes as to kinship, black or white, but obedience? You don't seem to remember the Egyptian and Roman forebears of Europe. But, the insistence of intending to be white at all costs and accepted by white confuses Europe with white but Europe is not white. The irony is that many Western Hemispheric Amerindians regardless of complexion make this error, they reject the bible given to them by Europe and also the creed and then they hope to be accepted when Europe is a church more so than a complexion. They are very busy in propagating their non-racialised history and their faith and civilization in the non-racialised truth of humanity. But, if you are insisting on being white before being European while seeking acceptance from Europe and presuming that hurting another human being with a darker complexion will aid your mission in approximating white or European , then in trying soo hard to be something and approximate something what could you really be? But, certainly you are not European and you are not whatever you imagine about ''white.'' Now, when a character known as Mr. White said something about saving America in a movie entitled Spectre or alluded to saving America, complexion is not the issue. Africans and West Indians were Mr. White's clients, associates and employees since not even Spectre discriminates. They are trusted with the collector's items and the collector's automobiles. You are the jester population; not the teacher or propagator of quiet civilite' that worked to settle and lead philosophically the 13 colonies with its 9 crime population of less temperate and philosophical new hopefuls who may have found an opportunity for leadership with a more indigenous population that faced the threat of slavery under the colonial laws unless and until they were Christened and assimilated physically with appearance and with food and clothing into the received culture and this is the tension of America where a man is stuck between two constitutions and two notions of independence but he is headed toward a world, although still emotionally on the cusp of it, where his home has to be owned and also his big SUV and they must be bought; not stolen with the power of one man and his associations resisting the power of his neighbor so that he might have something if not more and more; who would not want more? These Americans in the truth of E Pluribus Unum are a usually very beautiful human ensemble of various dna just like a European. Europe is inviting you to come as you are just like Jesus at the altar. Won't you come and what do you offer in this exchange and mutual valuation of human cultures at the table of brotherhood? What do you bring to the pot luck as an Amerindian? Will it be a burrito, a hot dog a kebab a West Indian pattie, a samosa or bannock bread with meat and sauce? Will it be a beaver tail pastry. A beaver tail pastry is good enough. Will it be a donut? Have a Diwali festival of some kind or your own new year festival. How do you turn a Christmas tree and Christmas into a panic for acceptance? What about a Diwali or something that represents you and be yourself with reasonable expenditure alongside the Christmas? Relax. Have a Redstripe. The real issue is that you always want to ask who is getting more than you while nothing is growing in your family yard; not your flocks and your children are your competition in your smallness while you meditate on being accepted as a French King and you must have realised this was a game by now when you don't even speak French and nor are you interested in learning the language since if you did really want to be a King worthy of vetting then you would also be a the good deacon in the bible and the good Asian family leader where your walls are not breached by people who tell you that your children are trying to be above you when they work to bring good. He or they bring opportunities to you to make money and the people you cavort with steal and attack your Japanese Log house so who can be a king of a nation when he cannot decide to be a family first. Their loyalty is evident. Maybe you should let him be free of the attack you bring as a bewildered shaman who is about to go to outsiders about his lands in Arizona and in Wisconsin. If you are a Shaman, what would be wise but the Fitch potty water dna from the back of some toilet in France where they collected king pretenders in prison cells where they lived alone and died alone is what is preventing you from seeing clearly although you are capable. You could build a house with your sense of balance but you seem to work to only destroy your family; your nation in fear of not being accepted but not accepted by whom or what? What is the fitch except but a deceipt? Just be worthy of respect as a watch maker or a shed builder or maybe a modular home builder. You see, Seiko(TM) and D and G(TM) are quite similar. What does the King of France have to do with where he is and what he is doing? Keep your mind on where you are and what you are doing. Now, instead of growing you have turned the entire family experience into a stalemate. You buy Christmas toys that might suggest military work and your son earned enough education to do several jobs in the military. Some say he should have applied by Grade 10; sure and the military would have paid for his medical training or maybe not. But, he applied when ever he applied and there was nothing wrong with that. His time and energy was not wasted and nor was the time of the military wasted. It was time well spent since the citizen is always working for the best of his country; just like the military. But, you seem to be confused; sort of like a warrior fighting the railroad in the last generation who is now rebranded as a West Indian from Haiti or Jamaica as a Ton Ton Macoute protege maybe whose ancestry was really Cheyenne but the resistance of the English is something you hold in common across the generations and here you are as a bus driver supervisor in Connecticut driving the Benz but you are trying to be the only one more than being a family. So, your son buys you gifts and has girlfriends but after he becomes a professional, you are confused and maybe there is no way to get that Fitch pretender dna out of your soul but there is. There has to be since some children notice the childish ego behavioral patterns in them at an early age but they choose to shuffle off that immature coil and enjoy what inspires them. Now, did someone say you would become a general in China/Jamaica if you...cut yourself off of the earth? Hmm...maybe they have the same fitch dna like you but you would have to trust whom? Your son, maybe your only one and the youngest is not dead. He is your first born while you were hoping to see him and the other children fight and for what; so that they might live alone and die alone like you? Did a son offer you a condo purchase opportunity on a $200,000.00 suite for a contribution of $10,000.00 together($5000.00 each) to earn 50 percent of the equity and you said no? The equity is the difference between the acquisition price with the down payment with the mortgage to be paid off and the sale price. If the property goes up by $5000.00, you have $5000.00 equity. But, with only 10,000.00 down payment and a $190,000.00 mortgage to be cleared on sale of the property, you have only made $15000.00 on the sale while your acquisition cost is $10000.00 so you have only come out of the deal being up $5000.00 with profit of $5000.00 along with the $10000.00 you made. But, if the property sold for $300000.00 then you would make $110,000.00. The answer is here; 300 thousand sale price-190 thousand mortgage equals $110,000.00 in return on investment(roi) with $100000.00 profit. The profit is calculated as the roi minus the acquisition cost of 10,000.00. The equity is the $100,000.00. The 50 percent of the equity is $50,000.00. This is shaman wisdom man; make some money man with some ''High Schoo'' grade mathematics and did the Alderman decide to leave one of his homes to your second son but you resent it since you need to inherit once, you say, and you don't seem to believe anyone will put you on their will while you are still alive while you would rather kill and steal and go crazy and waste this opportunity the alderman bestowed upon your family to work together and collect rents? But if you will steal from your son, then that is not inheritance and the whole world is watching you fail as a puppet show and what inheritance shall a stranger bestow upon you when you hurt family and friends of family but it is not too late if you let your son enjoy that man's intention and forget about the word inheritance. It is just that you seem to working hard so that people might hate you while you are the greatest proponent of the bible in telling them that your children, in spite of your abuses, interruptions and intimidation must honor you. But, you are not French. You are a Shaman; remember? You don't even want to learn the language although if you could build a house you could learn a language parce que Il n'est pas difficile avec etudier avec beaucoup livres dans votre sac en l'ecole. This is written in love of family Jeffe; hombre! You are busy trying to beat your children as if in a race; not working as a team and team work is the true Arawak, Navajo, Ojibwe, Azteca Lime Key culture but no one is competing with you when anything they dream of doing is in honoring all of his family and you too evidently, so do not interrupt what is being done for a very big family across the generations to honor the ancestors; all the ancestors; Merci. Domo, Gracias, Sze sze, Aye!, Amandla, Ób'ókhían, Grazie, Ahlan wa sahlan, We reach...wheel and turn! But, know that Montezuma and the Azteca people along with the Mayan people did not sacrifice their children for acceptance by any God. If a school teacher in Arizona asked you to allow them to drop your child down to general or the bottom groups, you would say no. If her brothers and sisters asked you to help them drop your son out of law school or out of the law profession, you would say no. You are a shaman, you say, and is it not good for a shaman to know how to navigate the treaty rights that give him paid rents from the government while he maintains his shaman nation lands? In any event, he is your family. You argue about how you see the world and understand the creator but there is only one person between you and your white bible study leader who thinks that your dignity is sacrificial but it is not the Bible study leader. So, when did Yoda's Shaman brother or relative start sacrificing and to whom to feel accepted while resenting and resisting a regular full education whether or not you believe the Bible is true? Are you the son of the native who confused white acceptance with American dignity and did not obtain either for doing what his enemy in the land negotiation wanted him to do only to get back his special totem pole but now it sits in the British Museum? They would have given it back if you were willing to let them take a photo of it and create a replica so that you might share a bit in the Great human family and would pay you also. But this bible study leader named Prophet Josiah wrote it down along with a Catholic Priest sent to the Pueblo people that if you were human enough, you would not seek his acceptance as a man and you would not cut off your lines of family if you thought about lines like some European people do but lines are not the issue here when there is only one attached to any thrones in Europe but are you human to just respect your ancestry and honor your ancestry whether or not someone taunts you to sell your son's totem poles contrary to his knowledge or do you think you should be able to do anything you want if you are his father; go into his cave or go into his house and just be with his wife and children in his role instead of protect them as the grandfather in his temporary absence at work as a parking officer? Did you know donuts are an Amerindian food creation? But, it gets washed away in the melting pot mind of America. When you see a donut, think Blackfoot or Huron Indian. Certainly, think Amerindian. Bring your food to the table and your foods will not be attacked and nor should you attack and disdain the European food and how could Saint Augustine be a Black African but he was. There is nothing wrong with that. We can hire the mannequin to go to Court. Warren will read the files and analyse it with his sleeves rolled up. If you want to start a legal services firm, he will help you set up your own. There is nothing in Angel Ronan(TM) but photos that anybody can take. It is a church directory and library information search service dedicated to the rule of law in all jurisdictions. It is not an Irish name but French by coincidence. Now if the firm or business was Augustine Lyon or Angel Lyon someone would still have to perform with Studious Petitions demonstrating Quality and Respect; nothing else tempting you really so go take some photos!! But, in terms of settled intentions as to property and ownership many are still receiving a culture that requires a civil liberty and involves a civil liberty outside of a cave but within a papered world of ownership of property or registration of right to exclusive occupation of any dwelling and this aboriginal American mind, possibly ''9 crimes'' grendel European, is still receiving this culture of papered citizenship and is not European but that outsider while you can insist on being what ever dehumanizing color you want to be and usually such people resent education, symphonies, art and artists and essayists but may try to use such people and their work so that they might have association to avoid detection but how could theft of other people's work do anything other than identity you as the enemy of the creed the enemy of community and civilization? This is the real filibuster and bipartisanship between two intentions as to the meaning of one's civil liberty and who would argue about property rights or the need to buy a house vs. just taking a house from someone and hoping you have enough authority to intimidate the owner out of his ownership; a cave man maybe? What society would tolerate it? This is the unseen civil war. as Hobbes said where the power of one man resisteth the power of another with no civil liberty between them or betwixt them to protect the rights of either such that life is nasty brutish and short. You can't own that home so why bother trying to displace anyone; even your son. You can't own that land in the West Indies so why bother killing your relative? The government is watching and already done told you. This is the gridlock between two minds and two intentions as to the meaning of freedom, independence, liberty and life set against the backdrop of one written constitution and several other founding documents that buttress and give support to it. In the mean time and the midst of this socio-economic divisiveness, the continent's people are passing away since the law abides and the they are gung ho men and women who want to understand why the vehicle is not registered and nor is the fire arm and the house you are in belongs to someone else. There is no vacant registration. There is one rightful dweller or maybe two or three but it is not you too often. If you were European or within the skin color you imagine or associate as being European, you would not have to try to so hard and murders of diligent people regardless of complexion who satisfy the appreciation of Europe in art, music and in linguistic facility would not be victims so often due to the fact that they hold European qualifications from Europe. They do not hand them out for free but to people who show their reverence and submission to the Europe and its non-racialised, humane validity but maybe you wrote the UDHR and you forgot that it is really Amerindian in virtue and this has created terrible tension that you refuse to honor it for your own citizens instead of render them economic refugees within the greatest nation on earth or continent on earth. Now, the African saw the bible on his continent; including other evidences of the world's history such as Saint Augustine and Marcus Aurelius. He saw Egypt and the Coptic Church. He was brought to America to assist in your assimilation journey as witness to the age old civilization that your continent is receiving so what Black man asks if the bible is true except but the Western Hemispheric Aboriginal since an African cannot deny himself and his history and hope to feel good about it? But, if you are aboriginal with an E Pluribus unum genetic ancestry, you will see Africa and the bible as synonymous when you honor all of your ancestry. It is the pirate grendel cave dweller who is always in between the two opinions; always emerging from the independence of the cave, the freedom of the cave and cave ownership vs. promises in the written Declarations of Independence, the guaranteed 'Constitutional' freedoms of society and its various rules as to property and property protection and ownership who is confessing his indentured servant ancestry and his struggle in between the two opinions that has led to his 9 ancestral crimes vs. the ten commandments in our midst who has become the more suave wool suited, fast driving fast talking cotton gin and barb wire sales man. His hands and feet are big and he is quick witted just as his people were at the OK coral where the power of one man's six shooter resisteth the tranquility, quiet farm life and power of another. But, does he believe, really believe, we should respect the ten commandments or the constitution of the United States and the Magna Carta as based upon them or is it that the Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence and the violent takes your farm by force while in the Father's house there are many mansions? The wrong answer here renders us in continual civil war and only in North America or in the Western hemisphere where this debate continues and only in the Western hemisphere but not all men with big hands and feet are involved in this debate. Some people with big hands and feet are quite settled and prosperous with the answer. See the full article at www.theangelronanissue.wordpress.com.

So we see the  ''we the people of the cave'' who seek the  freedom, independence and liberty of the cave  are juxtaposed with the ''we the people of  the entire world'' who seek the freedom of the constitution and the independence and liberty of the written document.  Here lies the crux of the matter as to theory and practice in our socio-economics; in our experience with the discussions centred on our mutual societal experience. Here is the juxtaposition of the most guttural human  hunt and gather culture running through every culture  vs. the received, papered written culture of laws, rights and constitutions with tremendous technologies; our electric culture.  In the impasse that might take place in the unresolved juxtaposition in any jurisdiction, people die and a revolving immigration  with a reliance on other populations  may ensue when the educated as to the laws and rules, either born and educated in the  impasse jurisdiction or those who sought refuge or migrated and then  who became educated, are attacked by those who are not educated as to the laws and rules of society and who seek other  means and  accesses  of freedom and liberty.   It is a silent civil war and in the gap, other communities and populations in other jurisdictions are relied upon  where populations can thrive in the joy of the final answer with basic income. You will see culturally diverse neighborhoods disappear and become monolithic culturally.  Torodo is an example of the emerging  non-diverse monolithic as a glorious, very East Asian supported  mining town that  is to be juxtaposed with neighborhoods like Minneapolis St. Paul and Oklahoma where they do have a basic income sufficient to support merchants of any back ground who wish to open shops and run businesses if they choose to reflecting diverse cultures.  In some impasse jurisdictions with a lot of  residential and industrial building work, who do they intend will live in and buy the units in the buildings? The buyers seem to be Asian and who may get special multi-unit rates and that is matter of domestic economics when the buyers could have been North American if they had the basic income from the government's who operate the impasse jurisdiction.  The end result  in the impasse jurisdictions is that , personally, the developers  building in places like Torodo are supporting some people, non-Asian people, in those impasse jurisdictions and carrying the economic burden with their own kind of social benefit above $40,000.00 when the burden, by legal right, is to be born by the government and maybe the developer could still support...his people if he wished to...with something maybe a bit less.     Torodo, therefore, is an example of a jurisdiction where the impasse in the juxtaposition remains unanswered while the constitutional solution; the  domestic and international  human rights solution  provides and sustains all involved and its really good if you are only minded to shop, eat and enjoy food and clothing primarily; maybe run a business.         In all of this, there is one other issue and that is the connecting faith of all of these people. Some of us say we believe God is white and that is to bring God into the human realm as flesh; as an idol and it is divisive when God is a spirit and if your neighbor joined you with his own incarnation, he might say God is...Irish or God is man's best friend like a dog who comes when you call Him and none of this satisfies when God is not my human equal but Sovereign  but it is best to leave Him without limiting definitions that do not satisfy ''Sovereign'' and say ''God is...''  See the final solution and the final answer. See the technology that all of God's creation are enjoying.      They fail to see the airline passenger information  terminal across the globe as the final answer. A Pakistani lady working in New Jersey knows your height and food preference on flights. She worked for the same airline, American Airlines, in Pakistan.  You have been very busy putting your citizens into the fray for their civil liberties at home while recruiting for people to offer their lives to fight to defend these rights; yes at home and abroad while you court new immigrants to enjoy your promise of being the greatest nation or continent on earth but is anything they own in the greatest nation safe of he or she is an actual full exam full course graduate?      The greatest proponents of ''them and us'' capitalism are only Americans who are really engaged in systemic questions while they feel preserved by a force vs. force mentality that says they will always be productive if they parasite on someone or something belonging to another to kill, steal and destroy.  This has nothing to do with the skull and bones symbol as used by illustrious societies, pirates and the evil Nazi German SS alike but the fact that there are systemic answers to the questions at the finger tips and on the speed dial or right down the road on your information super highway so that  you would see  how the solution of basic income enables a treasure trove of economic activity that protects the most important variable, the human variable, in the economic equation as essential  and gives breath to generated resources such as the return on capital investments so that even if you wanted to steal from people or from the system, there is something from where; there is a system from which one could steal as basic income does not mean human nature, sin and error that may be bent toward killing stealing and destroying  is going away.  Yet, the basic income is just some energy.. a little  money guaranteed per citizen yearly, that is to say, to keep the wheels of the  economic system  turning round and round when there is less money per citizen on average due to the industrial automation.  It is not a lot of money and it will be spent; $60,000.00 per year is proposed to see the European or the Asian economic buoyant  escapade and just exactly what is happening in Some Parts of North America right now who have submitted to the UDHR in principle as not to be a rogue jurisdiction within a rogue state jurisdiction.     So, who would seek acceptance from Europe and then hesitate to put in the final solution provided by Europe when acceptance by Europe  is not based on physical attributes as to kinship, black or white,  but obedience?  You don't seem to remember the Egyptian and Roman forebears of Europe. But, the insistence of intending to be white at all costs and accepted by white confuses  Europe with white but Europe is not white. The irony is that many Western Hemispheric Amerindians regardless of complexion make this error, they reject the bible given to them by Europe and also the creed and then they hope to be accepted when Europe is a church more so than a complexion.  They are very busy in propagating their non-racialised history and their faith and civilization in the non-racialised truth of humanity.  But, if you are insisting on being white before being European while seeking acceptance from Europe and presuming that hurting another human being with a darker complexion will aid your mission in approximating white or European , then in trying soo hard to be something and approximate something what could you really be?  But, certainly  you are not European and you are not whatever you imagine about ''white.'' Now, when  a character known as Mr. White said something about saving America  in a movie entitled Spectre  or alluded to saving America, complexion is not the issue. Africans and West Indians  were Mr. White's  clients, associates  and employees since  not even Spectre discriminates. They are trusted with the collector's items and  the collector's automobiles.  You are the jester population; not the teacher or propagator of quiet civilite' that worked to settle and lead  philosophically  the 13 colonies with its 9 crime population of less temperate and philosophical new hopefuls who may have found an opportunity for leadership with a more indigenous population that faced the threat of slavery under the colonial laws unless and until they were Christened and assimilated  physically with appearance and with food and clothing into the received culture and this is the tension of America where a man is stuck between two constitutions and two notions of independence but he is headed toward a world, although still emotionally on the cusp of it, where his home has to be owned and also his big SUV and they must be bought; not stolen with the power of one man and his associations resisting the power of his neighbor so that he might have something if not  more and  more; who would not want more?     These Americans in the truth of  E Pluribus Unum are a usually very beautiful human ensemble of various dna just like a European. Europe is inviting you to come as you are just like Jesus at the altar. Won't you come and what do you offer in this exchange and mutual valuation of human cultures at the table of brotherhood? What do you bring to the pot  luck as an Amerindian? Will it be a burrito, a hot dog a kebab a West Indian pattie, a samosa or bannock bread with meat and sauce?  Will it be a beaver tail pastry.  A beaver tail pastry is good enough. Will it be a donut?  Have a Diwali festival of some kind  or your own new year festival. How do you turn a Christmas tree and Christmas into a panic for  acceptance?  What about a Diwali  or something that represents you and be yourself with reasonable expenditure alongside the Christmas? Relax.  Have a Redstripe.  The real issue is that you always want to ask who is getting more than you while nothing is growing in your family yard; not your flocks and your children are your competition in your smallness while you meditate on being accepted as a French King and you must have realised this was a game by now when you don't even speak French and nor are you interested in learning the language since if you did really want to be a King worthy of vetting then you would also be a the good deacon in the bible and the good Asian family leader where your walls are not breached by people who tell you that your children are trying to be above you when they work to bring good. He or they bring opportunities to you to make money and the people you cavort with steal and attack your Japanese Log house so who can be a king of a nation when he cannot decide to be a family first.  Their loyalty is evident. Maybe you should let him be free of the attack you bring as a bewildered shaman who is about to go to outsiders about his lands  in Arizona and in Wisconsin.  If you are a Shaman, what would be wise but the Fitch potty water dna from the back of some toilet in France where they collected king pretenders in prison cells where they lived alone and died alone is what is preventing you from seeing clearly although you are capable. You could build a house with your sense of balance but you seem to work to only destroy your family; your nation in fear of not being accepted but not accepted by whom or what? What is the fitch except but a deceipt?   Just be worthy of respect as a watch maker or a shed builder or maybe a modular home builder.  You see, Seiko(TM) and D and G(TM)  are quite similar.    What does the King of France have to do with where he is and what he is doing? Keep your mind on where you are and what you are doing.  Now, instead of growing you have turned the entire family experience into a stalemate.  You buy Christmas toys that might suggest military work and your son earned enough education to do several jobs in the military.   Some say he should have applied by Grade 10; sure and the military would have paid for his medical training or maybe not.  But, he applied when ever he applied and there was nothing wrong with that.  His time and energy was not wasted and nor was the time of the military wasted. It was time well spent since the citizen is always working for the best of his country; just like the military. But, you seem to be confused; sort of like a warrior  fighting the railroad in the last generation who is now rebranded as a West Indian from Haiti or Jamaica as a Ton Ton Macoute protege maybe   whose ancestry was really Cheyenne but the resistance of the English is something you hold in common across the generations and here you are as a bus driver supervisor in Connecticut driving the Benz but you  are trying to be the only one more than being a family. So, your son buys you gifts and has girlfriends but after he becomes a professional, you are confused and maybe there is no way to get that Fitch pretender dna out of your soul but there is. There has to be since some children notice the childish ego behavioral patterns in them at an early age but they choose to shuffle off that immature coil and enjoy what inspires them.  Now, did someone say you would become a general in China/Jamaica if you...cut yourself off of the earth?  Hmm...maybe they have the same fitch dna like you but you would have to trust whom?   Your son, maybe your only one and the youngest is not dead. He is your first born while you were hoping to see him and the other children fight and for what; so that they might live alone and die alone like you?    Did a son offer you a condo purchase opportunity on a $200,000.00 suite for a contribution of $10,000.00  together($5000.00 each)  to earn 50 percent of the equity and you said no? The equity is the difference between the acquisition price with the down payment with  the mortgage to be paid off and  the sale price.   If the property goes up by $5000.00, you have $5000.00 equity. But, with only 10,000.00 down payment and a $190,000.00 mortgage to be cleared on sale of the property, you have only made $15000.00 on the sale while your acquisition cost is $10000.00 so  you have only come out of the deal  being up $5000.00 with  profit of $5000.00 along with the $10000.00 you made.  But, if the property sold for $300000.00 then  you would make $110,000.00.  The answer is here; 300 thousand sale price-190 thousand mortgage equals $110,000.00 in return  on investment(roi) with $100000.00 profit. The profit is calculated as the roi minus the acquisition cost of 10,000.00.     The equity is the $100,000.00.  The 50 percent of the equity is $50,000.00.    This is shaman wisdom man; make some money man with some ''High Schoo'' grade mathematics and did  the Alderman decide to leave one of his homes to your second son but you resent it since you need to inherit once, you say, and you don't seem to believe anyone will put you on their will while you are still alive while you would rather kill and steal and go crazy and waste this opportunity the alderman bestowed upon your family to work together and collect rents? But if you will steal from your son, then that is not inheritance and the whole world is watching you fail as a puppet show and what inheritance shall a stranger bestow upon you when you hurt family and friends of family but it is not too late if you let your son enjoy that man's intention and forget about the word inheritance.  It is just that you seem to working hard so that people might hate you while you are the greatest proponent of the bible in telling them that your children, in spite of your abuses, interruptions and intimidation  must honor you.   But, you are not French. You are a Shaman; remember? You don't even want to learn the language although if you could build a house you could learn a language parce que Il n'est pas difficile avec etudier avec beaucoup livres dans votre sac en l'ecole.   This is written in love of family  Jeffe; hombre!    You are busy trying to beat your children as if in a race; not working as a team and team work is the true Arawak, Navajo, Ojibwe, Azteca  Lime Key culture but no one is competing with you when anything they dream of doing is in honoring all of his family and you too evidently,  so do not interrupt what is being done for a very big family across the generations to honor the ancestors; all the ancestors;  Merci. Domo, Gracias,  Sze sze, Aye!, Amandla, Ób'ókhían, Grazie, Ahlan wa sahlan, We reach...wheel and turn!      But, know that Montezuma and the Azteca people along with  the Mayan people did not sacrifice their children for acceptance by any God. If a school teacher in Arizona asked you to allow them to drop your child down to general or the bottom groups, you would say no. If her brothers and sisters asked you to help them  drop your son out of law school or out of the law profession, you would say no. You are a shaman, you say, and is it not good for a shaman to know how to navigate the treaty rights that give him paid rents from the government while he maintains his shaman nation lands? In any event, he is your family.  You argue about how you see the world and understand the creator  but there is only one person between you and your white  bible study leader who thinks  that   your dignity is sacrificial but it is not the Bible study leader. So,  when did Yoda's Shaman brother or relative start sacrificing and to whom to feel accepted while resenting and resisting a regular full education whether or not you believe the Bible is true?      Are you  the son of the native who confused white acceptance with American dignity and did not obtain either for doing what his enemy in the land negotiation wanted him to do only  to get back his special totem pole but now it sits in the British Museum? They would have given it back if you were willing to let them take a photo of it and create a replica so that you might share a bit in the Great human family and would pay you also. But this bible study leader named Prophet Josiah wrote it down along with a  Catholic Priest sent to the Pueblo people that if you were human enough, you would not seek his acceptance as a man and you would not cut off your lines of family if you thought about lines like some European people do but lines are not the issue here when there is only one attached to any thrones in Europe but are you human to just respect your ancestry and honor your ancestry whether or not someone taunts you to sell your son's totem poles contrary to his knowledge or do you think you should be able to do anything you want if you are his father; go into his cave  or go into his house and just be with his wife and children in his role  instead of protect them as the grandfather in his temporary absence at work as a parking officer?      Did  you know donuts are an Amerindian food creation? But, it gets washed away in the melting pot mind of America.  When you see a donut, think Blackfoot or Huron Indian. Certainly, think Amerindian. Bring your food to the table and your foods will not be attacked and nor should you attack and disdain the European food and how could Saint Augustine be a Black African but he was. There is nothing wrong with that.  We can hire the mannequin to go to Court.  Warren will read the files and analyse it with his sleeves rolled up. If you want to start a legal services firm, he will help you set up your own. There is nothing in Angel Ronan(TM) but photos that anybody can take. It is a church directory  and library information search service dedicated to the rule of law in all jurisdictions. It is not an Irish name but French by coincidence. Now if the firm or business was Augustine Lyon or Angel Lyon someone would still have to perform with Studious Petitions  demonstrating Quality and Respect;  nothing else tempting you really so go take some photos!!     But, in terms of settled intentions as to property and ownership many are still receiving a culture that requires a civil liberty and involves a civil liberty outside of a cave but within a papered world of ownership of property or registration of right to exclusive occupation of any dwelling and this aboriginal American mind, possibly ''9 crimes'' grendel  European,  is still receiving this culture of papered citizenship and is not European but  that outsider while  you can insist on being what ever dehumanizing color you want to be and usually such people resent education, symphonies, art and artists and essayists but may try to use such people and their work  so that they might have association to avoid detection but how could theft of other people's work do anything other than identity you as the enemy of the creed the enemy of community and civilization?  This is the real filibuster and bipartisanship between two intentions as to the meaning of one's civil liberty and who would argue about property rights or the need to buy a house vs. just taking a house from someone and hoping you have enough authority to intimidate the owner out of his ownership; a cave man maybe? What society would tolerate it? This is the unseen civil war. as Hobbes said where the power of one man resisteth the power of another with no civil liberty between them or betwixt them to protect the rights of either such that life is nasty brutish and short.  You can't own that home so why bother trying to displace anyone; even your son. You can't own that land in the West Indies so why bother killing your relative?  The government is watching and already done told you.  This is the gridlock between two minds and two intentions as to the meaning of freedom, independence, liberty and life  set against the backdrop of one written constitution and several other founding documents that buttress and give support to it.  In the mean time and the midst of this socio-economic divisiveness, the continent's people are passing away since the law abides and the they are gung ho men and women who want to understand why the vehicle is not registered and nor is the fire arm and the house you are in belongs to someone else. There is no vacant registration. There is one rightful dweller or maybe two or three but it is not you too often.      If you were European or within the skin color you  imagine or associate  as being  European, you would not have to try to so hard and murders of diligent people regardless of complexion  who satisfy the appreciation of Europe in art, music and in linguistic facility would not be victims so often due to the fact that they hold European qualifications from Europe. They do not hand them out for free but to people who show their reverence and submission to the Europe and its non-racialised, humane validity but maybe you wrote the UDHR and you forgot that it is really Amerindian in virtue and this has created terrible tension that you refuse to honor it for your own citizens instead of render them economic refugees within the greatest nation  on earth or continent on earth.    Now, the African saw the bible on his continent; including other evidences of the world's history such as  Saint Augustine and Marcus Aurelius.   He saw Egypt and the Coptic Church. He was brought to America to assist in your assimilation journey as witness to the age old civilization that your continent is receiving so what Black man asks if the bible is true except but the Western Hemispheric Aboriginal since an African cannot deny himself and his history and hope to feel good about it?   But, if you are aboriginal with an E Pluribus unum genetic ancestry, you will see Africa and the bible as synonymous when you honor all of your ancestry.         It is the  pirate grendel cave dweller who is always in between the two opinions; always emerging from the independence of the cave, the freedom of the cave and cave ownership vs.   promises in the written Declarations of Independence, the guaranteed  'Constitutional' freedoms of society and its various rules as to property and property protection and  ownership who is  confessing his  indentured servant ancestry and his struggle in between the two opinions that has led to his 9  ancestral crimes vs. the ten commandments in our midst who has become  the more suave wool suited, fast driving  fast talking cotton gin and barb wire sales man. His hands and feet are big and he is quick witted just as his people were at the OK coral where the power of one man's six shooter resisteth the tranquility, quiet  farm life and power of another. But, does he believe, really believe, we should respect the ten commandments or the constitution of the United States and the Magna Carta as based upon them or is it that the Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence and the violent takes your farm by force while in the Father's house there are many mansions?    The wrong answer here renders us in continual civil war and only in North America or in the Western hemisphere where this debate continues and only in the Western hemisphere but not all men with big hands and feet are involved in this debate. Some people with big hands and feet are quite settled and prosperous with the answer.

See the full article at www.theangelronanissue.wordpress.com.

This was a war in the Brit Milah against those who wish to say the Brit Milah entitles them to some kind self expression that amounts to nothing other than graffiti and a sledge hammer on the various institutions and traditions that would allow a terrorist the freedom to imagine that they could kill a bonafide graduate for his degree certificate in the hope that the terrorist will achieve a greater sense of authenticity or acceptance or authority; the goal of the 1970's airplane hijackers born in Jamaica whose father was the actor thrown on the ground by Bond in Dr. No; their grand children maybe who came as refugees since he never had a certificate as a practitioner or cannot find his own and the school that he claimed will not assist. But, there is enough basic income for everyone and your bitterness is acknowledged but the female in Casino Royale(2006) who spent a night with Bond in the Bahamas is the daughter of the actor who felt aggrieved.

This was a war in the Brit Milah against those who wish to say the Brit Milah entitles them to some kind self expression that amounts to nothing other than graffiti and a sledge hammer on the various institutions and traditions that would allow a terrorist the freedom to imagine that they could kill a bonafide graduate for his degree certificate in the hope that the terrorist  will achieve a greater sense of authenticity or acceptance or authority; the goal of the 1970's airplane hijackers born in Jamaica whose father was the actor thrown on the ground by Bond in Dr. No; their  grand children maybe  who came as refugees since he never had a certificate as a practitioner or cannot find his own and the school that  he claimed will not assist.   But, there is enough basic income for everyone and your bitterness is acknowledged but the female in Casino Royale(2006) who spent a night with Bond in the Bahamas is  the daughter of the actor who felt aggrieved. 


Recent  breakdowns in the Brit Milah. have led many to consider the importance of public and private atmosphere on the dawn of new technologies that will allow for more than the appearance of civility across the 100's of miles of old homes, streets and boulevards stacked with John Lewis trinkets and Ikea pottery. This new dawn calls for a legislative and socio-economic enforcement not only in public administration in the Brit Milah  but in homes also that will involve a pre-emptive strike on sociological deformities or disfiguration to bring a conformity regardless faith and creed.   There will be no grey area but there will be quiet and freedom in that quiet to enjoy your creativity and your consumption as a blessed citizen; citizen by birth or naturalized. This is a war in the Brit Milah against those who wish to say the Brit Milah entitles them to some kind self expression that amounts to nothing other than graffiti and a sledge hammer on the various institutions and traditions that would allow a terrorist the freedom in a democracy  to imagine that they could kill a bonafide graduate for his degree certificate in the hope that the terrorist  will achieve a greater sense of authenticity since he never had a certificate as a practitioner or cannot find his own and the school that  he claimed will not assist; not even for 5000 pounds in Ontario.  The terrorist in his imagination considers himself to be  Rameses or the King of  Ptolemy but who is from a former Indian or French colony and possibly a successful refugee applicant in the year 2014 but rending the institutions that were enjoyed quietly for 100's of years. Who are they?  What do they wish to say to the court in consideration of their malfeasance and their utterance of fraudulent documents with the assistance of their immigrant countrymen who have committed a Criminal breach of trust by a public officer. This is not big brother but safe wives, family, pets, fridges, and vehicles since you have tolerated some kind of fallacious presumption for too long and it could not be in the worship of any Christ but it could be in the hatred of regular Television and an addiction to real life terrorist violence and drama involving people being burned at the stake or chopped with machetes in public.  The world has moved too far away from itself and its most fundamental expectations for long term human perpetuation of human civilization.

  

The manufacture of consent . ... In the 1988 book, “ Manufacturing Consent ,” Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky expounded on this Lippmann … Walter Lippmann introduced the notion of “manufacturing consent” in his book “Public Opinion,” which was published in 1922. As a journalist, Lippmann suggested that the “news” and the “truth” are not synonymous. The news, according to him, functions as a way of signifying how an event happened. In this sense, the subjective interpretation of the writer is a factor. The truth, he argued, refers to concealed facts. Democracy for Lippmann suffers because of the fragility as to how issues are played in the media. Which results in one crucial thing—the ignorance of voters. Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/91678/the-manufacture-of-consent#ixzz5VJ30O3eN Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

The  manufacture of consent . ... In the 1988 book, “ Manufacturing Consent ,” Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky expounded on this  Lippmann …

Walter Lippmann introduced the notion of “manufacturing consent” in his book “Public Opinion,” which was published in 1922. As a journalist, Lippmann suggested that the “news” and the “truth” are not synonymous. The news, according to him, functions as a way of signifying how an event happened. In this sense, the subjective interpretation of the writer is a factor. The truth, he argued, refers to concealed facts. Democracy for Lippmann suffers because of the fragility as to how issues are played in the media. Which results in one crucial thing—the ignorance of voters.

Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/91678/the-manufacture-of-consent#ixzz5VJ30O3eN
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

The Peace of Westphalia in a Nutshell

Emotional control is the issue and this is why you would kill a Jesus today when emotional control is the whole point of our ten commandments, our laws and our neighborly principles summarized as our ten commandments of communal living. Look into Jesus' eyes: Jesus is a Palestinian aboriginal born in his homeland that was suffering an occupation by a foreign Roman power and He had to deal with a foreign ruler who was also an aboriginal born in Britannia that was his homeland also suffering foreign rule and occupation under the Romans. You need to submit your ego to the personality of Jesus who picked up His cross, denied himself and followed the Holy spirit. He is not demeaning you as the only begotten son who was approved by the Father like Abel was approved in whom the Father is well pleased. To join Him is to have His approval and to deny there is any righteousness in you as separate from the Father. He is like the centurion; a man under orders and approved thereby the order giver just as Abel was approved since if you too do what is right will you not too be accepted? Abel heard and followed. Cain did his own thing but was offered a chance to also hear and receive approval since it is not Jesus' will that is being done but the will of the Fathah. Cain can take the offer and if he did hear God, how did he choose to reject himself and an association with the Fathah except that he made a choice to follow the emotion of jealousy instead of the emotion of family at all costs. The emotion of Jealousy destroys and the emotion of family builds. But, you don't want to believe that people actually watched Star Wars first and then read the bible and I don't know how to say it but....we don't know what you are asking but try the Buddha version maybe if you find the Euro version hard for you and listen to Watchmen Nee and Witness Lee. You will see; Sze Sze!! Yes; Warren wrote it but you can plagiarize this one!

Emotional control is the issue and this is why you would kill a Jesus today when emotional control is the whole point of our ten commandments, our laws and our neighborly principles summarized as our ten commandments of communal living.     Look into Jesus' eyes: Jesus is a Palestinian aboriginal born in his homeland that was suffering an occupation by a foreign Roman power and He had to deal with a foreign ruler who was also an aboriginal born in Britannia that was his homeland also suffering foreign rule and occupation under the Romans.    You need to submit your ego to the personality of Jesus who picked up His cross, denied himself and followed the Holy spirit.   He is not demeaning you as the only begotten son  who was approved by the Father like Abel was approved in whom the Father is well pleased.  To join Him is to have His approval and to deny there is any righteousness in you as separate from the Father. He is like the centurion; a man under orders and approved thereby the order giver just as Abel was approved since if you too do what is right will you not too be accepted?  Abel heard and followed. Cain did his own thing but was offered a chance to also hear and receive approval since it is not Jesus' will that is being done but the will of the Fathah.   Cain can take the offer and if he did hear God, how did he choose to reject himself and an association with the Fathah except that he made a choice to follow the emotion of  jealousy instead of  the emotion of family at all costs. The emotion of Jealousy destroys and  the emotion of  family   builds.  But, you don't want to believe that people actually watched Star Wars first and then read the bible and I don't know how to say it but....we don't know what you are asking but try the Buddha version maybe if you find the Euro version hard for you and listen to Watchmen Nee and Witness Lee. You will see; Sze Sze!! 

Yes; Warren wrote it but you can plagiarize this one! 

This photo taken on June 7th, 2016 is dedicated to the Queen and her propagation of the Anglo Culture, Language and the People on her 90th Birthday!

Click here for more. Concept of Human Nature according to God. Good energy like oil is used in balance with maintaining a viable, beautiful environment. Updated!

Concept of Human Nature according to God and John Locke: an Examination.

Updated: 02/01/2022. 

Every essay has an introduction, body and conclusion. This is not the original essay but Google the title and then read the oldest version and see the format that involves an introduction, Body and conclusion.
Introduction
----------
In the attempt to define the attributes of man, his needs, and his capacities, the concept of human nature is an intrinsic part of political discussion.
 Over the centuries, various concepts of human nature have evolved along with the development of political theory. In this discipline, the concept of human nature provides the hub around which a theory revolves. It provides the theory with its basis as well as a presupposition or premise to the political theory's conclusion."(i) Moreover, a concept of
human nature helps us to define the way one sees oneself and the world in which one lives. As well, the concept of human nature in political theory is an essential part of the construction of thought
regarding the political environment and the limits of action within that environment. It is through the use of the concept of human nature that we develop our
 paradigms(ii). Furthermore, by answering the question "what is man's nature?", one can proceed to answer the question "what is required to fulfill the needs of men and to secure a better existence?"(iii) Politically, this demonstrates the utility of the concept of human nature. When constructing a concept of man's nature, political theorists provide some moral
 justification for their postulates. The purpose is to
provide the theory with a substance, appealing to the conscience of men. Similar to other theorists, John Locke gives his concept of human nature moral justification by alluding to and making explicit reference to the commands of the Judeo-Christian God.       Social Contract as suggested by Rousseau
 gives safety to all. Based on Psalms 82, all are born free and all men and women are Kings and Queens of the world; children of God entitled to good dignity under natural law. See Pharaoh and Abraham in Genesis talking about Sarah. God warned Pharaoh.
The children of slaves; former human chattel like St. Patrick are continually paying back the cost of their freedom in some way or form if they so
wish; in defiance of God's grace. St. Patrick had a Cheddar reddish, brown complexion.  We try to understand this and why.   It is by God's unmerited favor that we are saved. It is the gift of God so that we cannot boast about our own endeavor. See Romans 7.       But, you don't have to join this truth although you could; certainly.     You might get jealous of those who defined themselves as always free. But, what man or woman  born after 1865 and provided education can say with certainty that  their ancestry was actually enslaved when there were many free men, Black and white,  in North America who did not live under the yoke of slavery prior to 1865?There were many humans, black and white, who had lived under the yoke of slavery.   The ancestor might be alive but he is tooo busy enjoying freedom and being free humbly.   Do you
know Angel Ronan(TM)?  Some of these Slaves were White or Red Cheddar like St. Patrick. In fact, he was a moor.   He could be my ancestor.    Then, they bought guns and decided to tell you about your 12 second pause at a traffic light in 2018.       For example, Locke tells us that men are "all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker; all the servants of one sovereign God."(p. 9) and are
therefore equal. While Locke attributes the source of his theories or concept of human nature to a moral Judeo-Christian God for the purposes of moral justification, it is questionable as to whether or not his theories or concept of human nature is in agreement, partially or completely, with the word of God as outlined in the Bible.



Our current format is impossibly unsustainable lest we subdivide the moon and the last remaining rain forests. What is needed is a third treatise which will hold in view the long term existence of all of mankind
.  If Locke had been honest in faith, he might have provided a theory for a system that would last not only three to four hundred years but that would have been truly inspired by the word of God and God's call to have dominion; dominion as in care for and sustain while also living from the earth. As such, everyone is the King of the world and is in a great social contract
as described by Rousseau.  We have been given collective dominion to preserve and enjoy.


The purpose of this essay is not to prove that God exists. God's existence can only be received by faith( as per Hebrews 11).  The purpose of this essay is to
investigate a God-given concept of human nature while contending that Locke's inferences about the commands of God regarding the state of nature and man's nature within that state are contrary to what is outlined in the bible. In this essay the term "human nature" and "state of nature" are used almost interchangeably.(iv) Biblical Outline of the state of
Nature In the book of Genesis, the biblical creation narrative is found. It is here that one must begin the search for a biblical concept of human nature or of man within his original and natural state. In the first book, God creates man in his own image (Gen. 1:26-27). Because of this, it is necessary to observe some of the attributes of God to obtain some insight into
the attributes of man. An example of some Godly attributes are holiness, purity, completeness and magnanimity. It follows that man was made in the image of these Godly traits. As well, God is spirit and therefore man had a likeness of God's spirit within him. In essence, God is perfect and therefore man, in his original state, was a resemblance of God's
perfection. In Psalm 8.5 it says, God made man "...only a little lower than the angels, and placed a crown of glory and honor upon his head." More simply, God is good and man, in his original state, was an image of this goodness(Gen. 1:31 King James version). God not only created man but also the earth. From the beginning, a special relationship existed
between man and nature. In the bible, it tells us that man lived in the garden with all the plants and the animals. Above all creation, man held a special place (Gen. 1:27-28, Psalm 8:6). He was commanded by God to populate the Earth and to subdue it. Yet "subdue" did not mean to destroy or to control with


force but for the offspring of Adam to prevail over the Earth in great numbers. Within nature, God also provided for all of man's needs. God said to man "I have provided all kinds of grains and all kinds of fruit for you to eat;" Gen 1:29 There was no need for man to farm or to work. He stood within nature, moving
about God's creation. He was in charge of the animals as authorized by God yet he did not use any means of force to maintain control. Man lived in harmony with the animals as they did not run from man nor did he run from them. Economies are like gardens within the power of our human cultivation and an intelligently cultivated economy has an income support provided to each citizen in amounts that satisfy all of their UDHR Article 25/Maslow needs at amounts that enable them to have economic dominion any where they may be on the earth. 

 God also commanded men to cultivate and to guard the garden of Eden;(Gen.2:15) He was its gardener and was to tend and to care for it. To explain further; Man's "dominion," of course, is as God's steward, not as one that is given license to "destroy the earth"(Rev. 11:18). "The Earth is the
Lord's, and the fullness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein"(Ps. 24:1). Nevertheless, although God retains ownership, man has been placed in charge of the Earth and all its systems, living and non-living.(v) In his natural state, man was not an irrational being. Unlike the animals, God gave man the capacity to reason and to make choices. As man
was made in God's image and God is a rational being, rationality is also a part of man's nature. By the very nature of the command to cultivate and guard the garden, God gave man the ability of mind(vi). He would not have given man any commands if man was a mindless ("robotic") being incapable of following or disobeying. Moreover, it is within the garden of Eden
, and within his original natural state of being, that man exercises his ability to make choices. "Come now let us reason together, saith the Lord:,"(Isaiah 1:18) After God made all of the animals, He brought them to Adam to see what he would name them. God Honored Adam's choices as the names of the animals remained unchanged. Adam also named Eve
, calling her a woman. Afterwards, he explained the reason for the name, saying "woman is her name because she was taken out of man."(Gen.2:23) Later, Genesis 3: 2,3 depicts man's choice to eat of the fruit of knowledge of Good and Evil. Verse 6, Chapter 3(living Bible) says that Eve was "convinced" to eat of the fruit. The word "convinced" indicates that Eve
had reached a conclusion through her faculty of reason. Although she knew that she was not to eat of the fruit, she was tempted with the choice of doing so. Verse 6 goes on to say that Eve saw how lonely and fresh the fruit was and that she believed the devil's promise that it would make her wise. Gen 3:13 depicts God's confrontation with Eve over the act of
disobedience. The Lord said "How could you do such a thing?" "The serpent tricked me" she replied. More simply, the serpent tricked her sense of reason through temptation and as a result, while exercising her ability to make choices, Eve ended up making the wrong choice ultimately. As Adam and Eve ate of the fruit, man committed the first sin. Defined as a transgression of the command or will of God, It follows that sin is doing something which is contrary to God's nature; and maybe we can also say it is doing something contrary to God's design also. Man is not born circumcised and the most evident impact of circumcision  is the time involved in coitus. It could also be full penetrative coitus which is not so easily achieved when not circumcised.    It was not the tradition of Catholics to be circumcised.  I am a Catholic.   Maybe the benefit is also certainty that one is the father in the proximity of other potential sires. However, if a woman is single at 35 years old and has had five husbands and the one they are with is not their own, then when she gives birth next week, we cannot say exactly who the father is as she is likely to have been already pregnant with the last man who gave her a proper siring or the very first semination with the family bath water or the Pool of Siloam/Solomon since that semination is a....living water. We could also say its deified.  Every conception is "...a Godly blessed moment."    After all of these observations, let us then ask what unnatural circumcision did  to the natural woman.  It seems Cosmopolitan in the modern era with its overt demands that stipulated (2019 issue) that the normal average single woman has 180 different partners a year for crazy copulation, wild copulation is evidence; and Seinfeld or Friends as  media anthropology is therefore not unusual with this polemic; except for one issue. The purpose of existing to achieve a family unit and raise children, achieving another generation seems to be missing in all of our various endeavours and if it was central, how could a certain  singleness be tolerated? But, its not your fault although we do not wish to tolerate it. Shouldn't everyone be settled down in a cohabiting, monogamous union?  

The other issue is that there is insufficient money for the individual self to focus beyond individual survival and achieve a settled union when any union is dependent on resources.  She says she is not your mother. He says he is not your father and the odds of a job being stable for long enough even if one is willing to share their personal resources is  also the key question in the era of ongoing job automation and the job famines.  A requisite income support also guarantees consumer stimulus with more efficiency, accuracy and efficacy than interest rate reductions in markets like the US where less than 20% of the population have a compliant income support that satisfies all Maslow needs and the UDHR Article 25 mandate. This may solve many problems so that no member of the family has to share their income support with the other in cases where unusually, inequitably, illegally, unconstitutionally only one gender is paid an income support in those unusual, illegally managed  territories that are defeating the national GDP economic agenda.  There is nothing wrong with equal and 1/3 of the GTA  is set to move to new suburbs in Erie, Ontario anyway.  This will help to achieve a more settled, coupled society and then if marriage, as a son of Grendel,  is not your culture yet, a guaranteed income support will help the female settler or male settler in his evolving into the averageness, usualness of that cohabiting culture. In the Beowulf and Grendel movie(2005), is there a reason why Grendel did not move in with the Scottish Celt woman or the Danish Celtish girl celebrated becoming one flesh?     

I suppose its tolerated when its not your fault when we are not demanding that the cave woman stay with the last man that she declared is her new husband(yet we should) and how did a woman walk through Abraham's lands and achieve the status of five former husbands where the sixth man and current man was not really her own; as identified by Abraham's relative named Jesus?  There is a  56 year old; she has been single for quite some time now as she fights Leviticus and its demand for monogamy.  There is  a single woman I know who is 56 that could have a husband if she understood that the purpose is to commit and stay forever. It could be that, in the final analysis, staying forever in any union is not immediately natural to the cave woman and Abraham may have found himself single at a late age with this truth. The woman at the well encountered by Jesus may have been a great great grand daughter of Lot's people where family boundaries had been interrupted in the cave with Lot and maybe their people never really left the CAVE as a dwelling; and you need to return those Angel Ronan files.  

Sire is defined by the Merriam Webster Dictionary as:

sire

1 of 2

noun

ˈsī(-ə)r 

Synonyms of sire

1

a

: FATHER

b

archaic : male ancestor : FOREFATHER

c

: AUTHOR(by plagiarising, are you challenging Warren as an author? Is this what you are doing when you steal his law files? How would you describe your motivation now that you can let go of hoping to graduate if maybe something happened to him.), ORIGINATOR

2

a

archaic : a man of rank or authority

especially : LORD 

—used formerly as a form of address and as a title

b

obsolete : an elderly man : SENIOR

3

: the male parent of an animal and especially of a domestic animal

sire

2 of 2

verb

sired; siring

transitive verb

1

: BEGET 

—used especially of male domestic animals

2

: to bring into being : ORIGINATE

 

   As man was made within the nature of God and was an expression of his goodness, the act of disobedience resulted in Man being cursed to stand outside of God's nature. Now, hydrogen is 5 times more efficient to produce while you could market it at 1/3 less per fill up to the consumer and make 4 times more in profit.  While God had provided for all of Man's needs within the garden,
(the fruit of the trees, the natural grains, the water of the river), man was forced to provide for his own needs outside of it (Gen.3:23). God cursed the earth so that man would have to struggle to extract a living from it with sweat and toil until his dying days (Gen.3:17-19). Before this, man did not die. Death was contrary to God's intentions. In the book of the Wisdom of Solomon, it tells us that God did not invent death; that when living creatures die, it gives him no pleasure. It says that he created everything so that it might continue to exist. (Wis.1:12-14) Soon after, the affects of sin became apparent. Cain killed his brother Abel out of envy. Before Adam's disobedience, there were no sentiments of this sort within the world. The first act of disobedience resulted in the rupture of fellowship and harmony with God, nature, and man. All of this was diametrically opposed to God's will and intentions. Nevertheless, this is not to say that reason and making choices is sinful but that man made the wrong choice due to the utilization of twisted reason; twisted by the Serpent's tempting. The result was that man's, once obedient, Godly, good, nature had changed becoming disobedient, ungodly, and carnal. He had lost his original nature, acquiring a sinful nature. He was no longer empowered by God's spirit but was fleshly. As time passed, God provided man with the ten commandments which, if followed, would prevent men from hurting one another. Primarily, the three main points of emphases behind the commands were to love God, love your neighbour as you love yourself and to do unto others as you would have them do unto you (John 13:34, Luke 6: 30). As love with and for ones fellow man was lost through sin, the commandments were a guide for men to follow throughout life. In overview, man's original nature or state of nature was Godly, pleasing to his creator, and was considered good. All of creation was under his charge as he fulfilled his role as a steward. He was commanded to prevail over the earth by being fruitful and multiplying. He was also to care for it and not to destroy it. He shared the garden with the animals and with Eve(his mate) and provided all with their names. Moreover, man was at peace with God and stood rightly before him, unified and harmonious with the creator and creation. As well, God gave man mind, providing man with the ability to reason and to make choices; both wrong and right apparently. He had made man sufficient to stand yet free to fall. Upon making a wrong choice, man acted contrary to his God-given nature which was to maintain relationship and connection to God and was forced to leave the garden. Forever more, man's nature was altered, becoming sinful. Therefore man, in a state of nature, given by God, is not his present nature. His true nature is the one which he possessed before he disobeyed God's command. The result of Adam's disobedience was the acquisition of the knowledge of good and evil. At this point, man stood outside of the garden, outside of nature, and was unnatural. All enmity, evil, and strife entered the world resulting in discord with God, the rest of creation and fellow man. This prompted God to provide man with the Ten commandments so they may live a life in accordance with His will. In Ecclesiastes 7:39 it is written, "God made us plain and simple, but we have made ourselves very complicated." John Locke provides us with a different picture of what man was like in a state of nature given to men by God. In this state, Locke speaks of men having possessions. He tells us that the earth had been given to mankind in common.(p. 18) To support this, he makes reference to Psalm 115:16 which says "The Heavens even the heavens are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men." Yet, he endeavours to demonstrate how men came to own property out of what was in common. He argues that every man has property within himself and the labour of his body. Therefore, if man mixed his labour with anything that was left in the common state, it became the product of his work, making it his property. It is labour which makes the distinction between what is in common and what is in private. No consent of any other man was necessary. It was a right given to men by God. At the same time, there were limits to how much a man could appropriate for his own use. He could not appropriate more than he could use. God did not allow men to spoil or destroy.(p. 20) Further in his argument, he infers that God gave the world to men for their greater benefit and did not intend for the world to remain in common and uncultivated. As a result, Locke argues that it was given primarily to the " industrious and rational...not to the fancy or covetousness of the quarrelsome and contentious" who would leave it to waste. Moreover he contends that God's commandment to subdue the earth instructed man to "improve it for the benefit of life."(p. 21) To do this, Locke argued man was required to labour. Adding to this further, he writes that God commanded, and (man's) wants forced him to labour; that was his property which could not be taken from him wherever he had fixed it.(p.22) From this, he concluded that subduing, cultivating, and having dominion over the earth were one and the same, and that God's commandment to subdue authorized man to appropriate property. Through these arguments, Locke justified the acquisition of property within the state of nature. It was in this natural state that men enjoyed perfect freedom, ordered their actions, disposed of their possessions and persons, as they thought fit within the bounds of the law of nature.(p.xiii) This law of Nature is defined as "that which forbids anyone harming another or destroying himself, and requires each to try when his own preservation comes not in competition" to preserve the rest of mankind."(p.xiii) Further, he says that all of mankind was under the obligation of this law and that it was synonymous to reason. Within this state of nature governed by natural law, there existed liberty, equality, and independence. Yet, Locke also tells us that there would be those who would transgress the law of nature, declaring themselves "to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men, for their mutual security." Such transgressions would result in the state of nature regressing into a state of war. Yet, it was within the state of nature that all of this occurred. Having looked at the concept of human nature according to the word of God and the one proposed by Locke where an effort was made by Locke to justify his theory with biblical references, it is clear that the two concepts disagree. The first area of discrepancy is the way in which the state of nature is defined. Locke defines it as the state in which men live together according to reason, "...without a common superior on earth, with authority to judge between them."(p. 15) Differing from this, a biblical definition would assert that the state of nature is one in which men lived in obeyance to the will of God. In other words, it was a state void of sin. In all of Locke's theory there is no mention of the original sin. In many cases, Locke makes reference to Adam but apparently ignores the event. As a result, he ignores the fact that Adam's nature had changed from its original Godly state into a sinful one. Because of this, Locke interprets the commands which God gave to Adam incorrectly. As outlined earlier, the command to "subdue" the earth is found in the same verse where God commands Adam to fill the earth with his progeny.(Gen. 1:7) Therefore, when read in context "subdue" did not mean to labour and to acquire property but to dominate the earth in great numbers. Moreover, God explicitly tells Adam that all of his needs are provided for within the garden.(Gen.1:29) Work was not necessary. Because of this, it is apparent that the command to cultivate the garden was not a command to labour for one's needs or for possessions but to "dress and to keep" the garden as would a gardener(Gen.2:15). As a result, it is evident that Locke interprets these commands with out making reference to man's original state, God and man's relationship with man, and God's provisions for mankind. In fact, Locke's theory on the state of nature is more congruent with what the bible tells us about man in his sin nature. Labour was a part of man's curse. As well, there was no concept of property before sin. A man would only say "mine" when he was in fear or concern of someone taking away what was in his possession (By possession, I do not mean something that one owned but something that one had taken up to provide for his needs; for example, a seed or an apple to eat. Man had no consciousness or knowledge of the concept "mine" because there was no threat of someone taking the seed or the apple away). In man's obedient nature, there was no sin, therefore there was no fear of being attacked or robbed by an adversary. It was only when sin entered the world that the fear of being attacked or murdered became a reality. Such acts occurred in Locke's concept of the state of nature yet according to the biblical text such acts could have only occurred when man was outside of his nature state and within his unnatural sin nature. To Locke, this state was governed by the law of reason. Apparently, he assumes that reason was always right and that man had to simply live by the reasoning of his mind. When man transgressed the rights of another, Locke argued that they were living contrary to reason and deserved to be punished. This is not defined as sin but as a transgression of the law of reason which God gave to all men. This transgression was committed not against God but against another man. Therefore it was not God who punished but man. He says that God gave man the right to punish but nevertheless God is still somewhat removed from the picture. While Locke tells us that reason and common equity were given to men for their mutual security, the bible shows us that God gave man the Ten commandments. Although reason is God given ability, it was not always right. Reason could be tricked or could lead one to do the wrong thing. As a result, it would be beneficial for men to trust God again and to live by the commandments of God than the dictates of man's fallible reason. From our analysis of Locke's theories and his attempt to justify his postulates morally with the word of God, it is apparent that Locke had no intention of agreeing with God's word and simply used it to provide a cloak of righteousness around his worldly, self-serving arguments. As it was mentioned earlier in this paper, one of the key purposes of the concept of human nature or of man within his natural state is to answer the question "what is man's nature?" so that one can proceed to answer the question " what is required to fulfill the needs of men?" As Locke tells us that man in a state of nature lived by right reason and sought to provide for his own needs as well as the needs of others, man was thereby moral. Yet, in his essay on Human Understanding, Locke says that man was also motivated by his appetites which were mainly a desire for happiness and an aversion to misery (Book 1, ch.3, sect. 3). Due to their pervasiveness, these appetites would lead men to contradict the law of reason and lead him into a state of war with others. Because of this, men were constantly exposed to the potentiality of invasion of their property and persons by others, leaving them unsafe, insecure, and anxious for his life.(p. 16, P. 65) Based on this concept of Human Nature, Locke concluded that the answer to man's needs for safety and security would be to step out of the state of nature and into society or government where man's appetites could be checked by the necessary rewards, punishments, minimum rules of morality, and positive laws. In great contrast to this, the word of God tells us that man in his natural state was Godly, free from sin, in harmony with his creator and with creation, secure, in no need of labour or property, God dependent, and free from all fears. Having lost this through disobedience, he stepped out of his natural state, was forced to labour, fell out of harmonious fellowship with the creator and creation, acquired the capacity to hate, envy, and murder relentlessly (stepping into a Lockeian concept of the state of nature). Since the Ten Commandments provided only a temporary solution to the problem, based on the biblical concept of man's essential Godly nature, what men required to fulfill their needs was the reconciliation of their relationship with God. God eventually provided for this reconciliation through Jesus Christ. Exemplifying this through his words, Christ called men to come unto Him so that he could give them rest, that in Him, they would find rest for their souls, while receiving only the light burdens of Christ (ie. Obedience to God, Matt 11:28). Man, in his natural state, was not required to labour but only to depend upon God.  Slavery, in the final analysis, is a sin against natural law and the laws of the Jewish people if it is more severe than an indentured servitude, does not respect human life and is a depravity, as a result, to both captive and captor. It becomes a burden that can only be quenched by a life of continual intoxication to suppress the burden.    This is so because Adam and Eve were told that they would have to earn a living by the sweat of their brow. Slavery that deprives life and living is a breach of God's commandment to all men. See Genesis 3:19. Je veux parler en francais sur mon bonheur avec mon famille  et ma femme sur Warren Augustine Lyon et mon communite'!  Some forms of chattel slavery in some tropical locations respected this balance and the prosperity of their peoples and their dignity is evident.  Abusive chattel slavery is redundant.  It costs money to house people. They work but they have no buying power. They do  not pay rent and a low security inmate used as free labor costs $80,000 per year per inmate and they have no buying power. The $80000.00 is not income it is just cost.  When most finished goods are made by machines, this is very expensive labor and they do not give back to the economy in consumption. If they earned $60,000.00 as dependent employees who could remain under some threat of immediate death by way of contract for 20 years if they show up late more than 5 times a week but who will take care of their own housing, vehicles, food and shelter, it is better for the economy.   So, bring armed guards to the meat packing plant in Florida and hire some  employees who will work and sing an old spiritual. Who wants anything made by an angry inmate? The buying public should receive a warning on the product.  The hangover from slavery where Blacks and Whites owned slaves is not just racialised attitudes in the final days of labor intensive agrarian economies that suggested superiority,  it is some kind of emotional dependency possibly for identity when English as a language is too amorphous and the new identities of white or black are irrelevant in the red, white and blue when you bled red (red; get it? It works the same in Black and White bodies just the way God designed it.) together  in front of German machine guns at least twice in history and were gassed or suffered nuclearh poisoning together at least four times by now in the various  theaters of war that include Europe and the Middle East.   It is clear that in light of freedom, some enslaved people chose to stay and asked "where would they go? What would they do?"   That could be logical on day one if you could not afford to buy a plot of land out west. But, eventually, you would have to decide to be content with your former master and the terms of your keep if he could afford you. As an American, you and your former master would have to get into some kind of business. and bag Quaker Oats in addition to producing peanut butter on mass, making pancake mix, designing light bulbs, building cotton gins, tractors  and building  vehicles. This new industrialized economy necessitates a minimum degree of education for both former slave and former master. It involves understanding time, temperature and other basic functions.  Black do not want to have sex with you even if you want to molest them as adults and adulterate their family unions. They are used to it now as a part of regular life in America. Its in the movies like Crash(2005) where the movie company paid millions in human rights law suits in claims made by Beige(formerly White) female activists.  Beige people (now White) people make claims to address these heinous scenes o  f a police officer molesting an American man's wife.      We are not offended by these scenes as Black people since the mulatto knows the scene depicts a cop that could be his or her father molesting a Black woman who could be her mother with whatever urine was used by granny to catch her eggs at 12 years old or that was maybe taken at the medical centre after a check up but you should never say it or else he will try to take your medical licence and then we have to go and support a war again and die for white shame and self rejection.   The answer here is to see the American founding documents as the final bond in a country founded by people who watched Anthony Johnson( see the case of  Johnson vs. Parker concerning a Mr. Cassor)   https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Court_Ruling_on_Anthony_Johnson_and_His_Servant_1655
and other Brown men as they owned beige(formerly white) and brown slaves before and after the constitution was passed in a non-racialised political and economic truth enshrining non-racialised human value with great cost  and great benefit  for all citizens.    This non-racialised human value must be enshrined today in the post civil war industrialized, continually automated and mechanized  world with basic income for every citizen and after we understand the concept, you can call it the safe, secure people insurance income if you like. We will generate more wealth and pay back all of  our debts with the small but necessary investment per citizen at ideally $60,000.00 per annum per citizen. Some may not choose to work but the amount is low enough to invite human;  lots of human involvement without hiring Asians who arrive in America now feeling very good and not desperate with their basic income in hand from Asia  and they are a more pleasing employee as they are less desperate and steal less often than the North American employees who seem to steal quite a lot and with thefts also from  the postal system.    The simple equation rolling through American life and absorbing a lot of human time and energy is the failure to confirm non-racialised human value in practice with basic income  after industrial automation  as in keeping  with non -racialised founding documents.  We now have Christ's sweat and blood from his brow so that we do not have to eat by and offer our own. We have His work. We  accept His work and His final economic solution in basic income so that we might have His rest more abundantly; 9999!!  Therefore, it is appropriate that Christ offered rest in return for obedience. As well, he also taught that...whosoever will save his own life shall lose it and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul.(Matt. 16:25,26) In this verse, it demonstrates that man's needs would not be met by his attempt to satisfy his own needs independent of God but that losing oneself to Him by placing all of one's life in his hands was the answer to man's ultimate needs. Answering the need for the restoration of harmony between men and God, Jesus gave men the greatest commandment; Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy Heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself; (that within) these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.(Matt 22:37-40) Therefore God Himself, through Christ, was the answer to the needs of men as dictated by man's nature in his natural state according to the word of God. In conclusion, the purpose of this essay was not to argue for the existence of God but to suppose that He existed while investigating what the bible had to say about man in a state of nature. That being said, Hebrews 11:6 is evident in that it says he who comes to God must believe that God is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. The intention of this essay, therefore, was to demonstrate that Locke's conception of man in a state of nature was contrary to what is outlined in the creation narrative in Genesis and to the rest of scripture. Having investigated this, it results that even though Locke uses the word of God in his arguments, he uses it incorrectly so that in the final analysis, Locke's theory conflicts greatly with the word of and the intentions of God. Because of this, the two concepts (that of God's word and Locke's) provide different answers to the needs of men as defined by the respective concepts of the state of nature. Locke proposes man-made government while the word of God proposes God's government manifested in the kingdom of Heaven through Jesus Christ: Therefore take no thought, saying what shall we eat? or what shall we drink? or, wherewithal shall we be clothed?... But seek ye first the Kingdom of God, and His righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.(Matt.6: 31,33) It is unfortunate for Locke, but man's reason is not perfect. It is fallible. Locke does not seem to acknowledge this. Hence, many of our world systems are inherently set on a crash course for collapse and have come to threaten man's very existence. It only took three hundred years from the time of Locke's first publishing where we must ask ourselves, how have we come to the brink of man's existence in terms of environmental failure or nuclear holocaust so rationally or is it irrationally? Our reason must be God dependent; not independent of God or presumptively right because it is called reason nor should it be worshiped as such. Our current reality is the proof of the error of our trajectory; the error of our calculation, the error of our Lockeian philosophy. A third treatise is needed which will not be so short sighted and driven by continual taking and the fear of not having enough; the profit driven, property and provision, and continual expansion paradigm. How many cars can we sell in China? Our capacity to realise a new energy paradigm based on hydrogen engines and fuel is realisable in this generation or whenever necessary since the technology was designed by the same companies that produce oil, freeing us from the doubt and global insecurity engendered by the dependence on fossil fuels (see link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykl2PH2B-tM&p=448B4793713D9028&playnext=1&index=23). Oil is good energy. No doubt, a switch to hydrogen will arrive in due course.  Anything short of realizing the hydrogen paradigm when necessary and in accordance with the outlook of the oil companies that produce hydrogen will be disappointing when the appointed time comes.  It would be a failure of our collective genius (see link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcsRk_gtO2U&feature=related).    Good energy like oil is used in balance with maintaining a viable, beautiful environment.  We are now spending critical resources and energy to consider the threat of rising water levels to global security and there were many individuals who refused to accept the scientific reality of global warming because it was decided by certain 'say so's' that it did not fit their political ideology but they do not live in Greenland or in the south pacific where the loss of polar ice caps and land mass respectively is a living reality. Our current format is impossibly unsustainable lest we subdivide the moon and the last remaining rain forests. What is needed is a third treatise which will hold in view the long term existence of all of mankind.  If Locke had been honest in faith, he might have provided a theory for a system that would last not only three to four hundred years but that would have been truly inspired by the word of God and God's call to have dominion; dominion as in care for and sustain while also living from the earth. As such, everyone is the King of the world and is in a great social contract as described by Rousseau.  We have been given collective dominion to preserve and enjoy. We can only leave behind what we have hoarded,once we have died. We should seek to leave 'life' and not just inanimate wealth to our own future generations; to our own children's children.  Noah is our one  common and human ancestor. This is so for any part troglodyte in 2017 as there are very few pure troglodytes these days that you could encounter on a London Tube platform or in a GCSE class. But, who is still asking, after high school graduation, how anyone owns an essay or has intellectual property rights in the creative work?   If you are asking this question as a university student, you have a troglodyte hypothalamus and new short 10 question placement exams will determine what additional study help and training you may need as to writing guidelines and proper referencing  of the work of existing authors.  Your well meaning intention in your plagiarism is not enough. You need the Brit Milah.  You need the rules. Do you want someone to plagiarise your work some day? You could be a doctor some day.   A Dr; no?     You could be a doctor someday. Dr; no?  The truth is that the House of Israel is  a house and Mephibosheth and Herrod are just an encroachment(henroach) on the peace of the house.   He, Mephibosheth,  seems to want to know that he will live forever.  David is not Israel but he represents the House of Israel in all of its love of peace, human frailty and grace.  What peace do we have unless we agree as to the need for mutual respect, security and safety of person and property in addition to the ultimate common denominator of human dignity in the world of post-automated economies? Fais ton comprend?  Est ton Reconnissant?  Add your family name to the bottom of this essay whether or not it is O' Rourke, Smith,  , Wok, Fuke Me , Mcdanaough, Varti, Hombosi,  Chalkesky, Blows, Skirt,  Studee, Atlaw.

For those who can do something about ending the separateness and struggles in common understanding, this will be the greatest gift that they can leave to their family's future generations. Everyone can do something about it although life is not a right. It is a privilege. Do you have a right to live and hurt people?   We must think beyond what happens when we die. There is a book written that discusses the philosophy behind the 'Terminator' movies but ultimately we are the philosophy. It is dark. It needs to change. Hopefully we will not lose sight of our God-given capacity to reason and also the need to trust in God in the effort to find a solution; a solution other than holocaust. So let it be as we look forward to a space port on the moon  in the year 2300 and cleaner oceans on earth with full service industry automation and full industrial automation.

 Concept of Human Nature according to God and John Locke: an Examination Warren Lyon Politics 237, University of Western, Ontario First written: March 1993 Edited: February 2010 Warren Augustine Lyon, B.A.(Hons), LL.B.(Hons), LL.M(LPC). Toronto, Canada Bibliography 1. Berry, C.J, Human Nature, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, Humanities press International: 1986 2. Locke, John., Second Treatise Of Government, Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing: 1980. 3. Morris,H.M., The Biblical Basis of Modern Science Grand Rapids, Baker Book House: 1984. 4. The Bible: King James version, Living Bible Translation, Good News Bible. Endnotes i)Christopher J. Berry, Human Nature (Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, 1986) p.133 ii)Paradigm is defined as a self-actualizing world view; Robert Melvin, Professor in Politics at the University of Western, Ontario. iii)ibid. as in #1. p. xiii iv). Lard is not a dictator's son and nor will he kill Warren Augustine Lyon only to live in Warren's identity as his only defense in trying to sell Warren's essays; nor does he intend to but if he did,  his desire to do this is the epitome of self hatred. The reason for this is that man's nature in the state of nature is, in essence, the same as human nature. The purpose of the concept of human nature is to look at man in his most natural state and this would most likely be found within the state of nature. v)Henry M. Morris, The Biblical Basis of Modern Science(Grand Rapids, Michigan, Baker Book House, 1984), p. 41 vi)Mind is defined as "that with which the living being feels, wills, and thinks; Intellectual ability, and the capacity to reason.,The New American Webster Dictionary Read more: http://www.bukisa.com/warren-lyon