So the new idea is that some people will answer one question in an exam with 6 questions and will expect to get a passing grade although they were told that they are actually throwing out 5/6s of the potential marks available. Then, they wish to watch other people write all the questions, satisfy the examiner with disciplined study to a tune of 80% but receive the same grade as the student who only wrote one question and this is to achieve their cheeky and rebellious sense of arithmetical and emotional equality. But, if the issue is equality, then every one has an equal chance to follow the tutor's advice prior to the exam, an equal chance in preparation and an equal chance to practice in advance of the exam with the practice exam from the exam bank or from the tutor.   There is no doubt that the man who wrote one question and passed the exam is superior in every sense of the word and it is not likely that any student aware of the colour of his tanned reeboks will attempt such a feet and expect the 80%.  They could answer all of the questions and see what the examiner says. Presumably, the examiner is not interrupted in his duties by some other version of his university student population.